Comparison Overview

RE/MAX

VS

MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services)

RE/MAX

5075 S. Syracuse St., Denver, CO, 80237, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

As one of the leading global real estate franchisors, RE/MAX, LLC is a subsidiary of RE/MAX Holdings (NYSE: RMAX) with more than 140,000 agents in almost 9,000 offices and a presence in more than 110 countries and territories. Nobody in the world sells more real estate than RE/MAX, as measured by residential transaction sides. RE/MAX was founded in 1973 by Dave and Gail Liniger, with an innovative, entrepreneurial culture affording its agents and franchisees the flexibility to operate their businesses with great independence. RE/MAX agents have lived, worked and served in their local communities for decades, raising millions of dollars every year for Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals® and other charities. To learn more about RE/MAX, to search home listings or find an agent in your community, please visit www.remax.com. For the latest news about RE/MAX, please visit news.remax.com. Each Office Independently Owned and Operated.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 42,963
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services)

11201 N Tatum Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85028, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

MEB’S ability to create value for both clients and residents has been the cornerstone of our success. Scott, Libby, Mark, and Jodi have been active in the real estate management industry and have over 125 years of combined experience. With their breadth and depth of knowledge, MEB is the “go-to” company for a diverse group of investors, providing management services to over 25,000 rental households and over 1,000,000 square feet of commercial property. MEB is based in Arizona with offices in Phoenix, Tucson, Flagstaff and provides management services throughout the Southwest and Midwest. We are over 600 team members strong and provide management, consulting, receivership and rehab services for all types and asset classes of rental housing including: Luxury Apartment and Rental Home Communities Work Force Apartments and Rental Homes Student-Oriented Communities Affordable, LIHTC, and HUD Communities Active Senior Housing Value-Add Opportunities We are privileged to provide service to a large and diverse group of clients that include individual and institutional investors, lenders, and special servicers. Every MEB team member is focused on creating value for our clients, residents, and fellow team members. It is our core purpose as a company and is embraced at every level of our organization.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remax.jpeg
RE/MAX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meb-management-services-morrison-ekre-&-bart-management-services-.jpeg
MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RE/MAX
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RE/MAX in 2026.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) in 2026.

Incident History — RE/MAX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RE/MAX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remax.jpeg
RE/MAX
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/meb-management-services-morrison-ekre-&-bart-management-services-.jpeg
MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RE/MAX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RE/MAX company.

In the current year, MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company and RE/MAX company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company nor RE/MAX company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company nor RE/MAX company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company nor RE/MAX company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RE/MAX company nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RE/MAX nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RE/MAX company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company.

RE/MAX company employs more people globally than MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither RE/MAX nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RE/MAX nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RE/MAX nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RE/MAX nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RE/MAX nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RE/MAX nor MEB Management Services (Morrison, Ekre & Bart Management Services) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N