Comparison Overview

Reliance Label Solutions

VS

Fujikura Graphics, Inc.

Reliance Label Solutions

205 N. Gold St., Paola, KS, 66071, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Reliance Label Solutions specializes in manufacturing hazardous container labels for the Petroleum, Chemical and Environmental industries. Our chemical drum labeling solutions meet GHS, HazCom and IMDG labeling requirements. Reliance is the only U.S. label manufacturer to offer BS 5609 Section 2 & 3 certified label materials for sheet-fed laser, two-color thermal transfer, pigment inkjet and continuous-form color lasers. "We're On It®"​ with certified materials, manufacturing best practices, our Vision® GHS Label Printing Software and inventory management. Our GHS compliant products include labels, label printing software, color printers and printer consumables. Reliance has proudly served petroleum refiners and marketers, chemical manufacturers, chemical distributors and general industrial markets for over 30 years.  We are centrally located outside of Kansas City and are ISO 9001:2015 certified.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fujikura Graphics, Inc.

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

With more than a half century of history in the manufacturing of offset printing blankets, and striving to create the best and most ecological product for mankind, Fujikura Rubber, Ltd. continues to develop and produce unique products by utilizing the composite technology based on original rubberized fabric production techniques, consistent with our rigorous R&D standards. Especially the field of graphical arts, with expanding global sales strategy, we continue to gain numerous numbers of customers world wide. Requirements from our closest and best relationships with our customer are incorporated into the specifications for new development. To realize those new demands, we are continually exploring the best components towards the next design. In 1999, Fujikura retooled and enhanced the quality management system approved by ISO9001. We assure not only quality, but also reliance and security. FUJIKURA GRAPHICS offers the product which can contribute to society, and also be a better partner ecologically, and globally.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliancelabelsolutions.jpeg
Reliance Label Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujikura-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Fujikura Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reliance Label Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fujikura Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Label Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fujikura Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Reliance Label Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Label Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fujikura Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fujikura Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliancelabelsolutions.jpeg
Reliance Label Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fujikura-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Fujikura Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reliance Label Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reliance Label Solutions company.

In the current year, Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company and Reliance Label Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company nor Reliance Label Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company nor Reliance Label Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company nor Reliance Label Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions company nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions company nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reliance Label Solutions company employs more people globally than Fujikura Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reliance Label Solutions nor Fujikura Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N