Comparison Overview

Reliance Digital

VS

NAPA Auto Parts

Reliance Digital

Reliance Digital, Navi Mumbai, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.reliancedigital.in

Reliance Digital is a Consumer Electronics, Durables, IT & Telecom retail arm of Reliance Retail Group with more than 1300+ stores across India. Reliance Digital seeks to fulfill the dream of every Indian, be it through its nationwide network of conveniently located stores or through its presence on the web, by providing a delightful shopping experience of products & solutions and helping them bring home the latest & best in technology from the widest selection at the lowest assured price with complete peace of mind through lifelong support. Products purchased from Reliance Digital are backed by Reliance ResQ, a ‘one-stop’ service centre that takes care of all your pre & post purchase service solutions regardless of the brand purchased.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,501
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NAPA Auto Parts

2999 Wildwood Pkwy, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30339
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://jobs.genpt.com

Through nearly 6,000 auto parts stores and over 16,000 auto care and collision centers in the U.S., NAPA has America’s largest network of parts and care. The NAPA Network is supported by nationwide distribution centers with approximately 800,000 available parts, accessories and supplies. Widely recognized for quality parts, rapid availability and knowledgeable people, NAPA Auto Parts stores serve automotive service professionals, do-it-yourselfers and everyday drivers with quality parts, accessories and supplies to keep cars, trucks and equipment performing safely and efficiently. For more information, visit www.napaonline.com.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 13,772
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-digital-retail-ltd-.jpeg
Reliance Digital
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/napa-auto-parts.jpeg
NAPA Auto Parts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reliance Digital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NAPA Auto Parts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Digital in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAPA Auto Parts in 2026.

Incident History — Reliance Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NAPA Auto Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAPA Auto Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-digital-retail-ltd-.jpeg
Reliance Digital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/napa-auto-parts.jpeg
NAPA Auto Parts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reliance Digital company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAPA Auto Parts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NAPA Auto Parts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reliance Digital company.

In the current year, NAPA Auto Parts company and Reliance Digital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts company nor Reliance Digital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts company nor Reliance Digital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts company nor Reliance Digital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reliance Digital company nor NAPA Auto Parts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reliance Digital nor NAPA Auto Parts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NAPA Auto Parts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Reliance Digital company.

NAPA Auto Parts company employs more people globally than Reliance Digital company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Reliance Digital nor NAPA Auto Parts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reliance Digital nor NAPA Auto Parts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reliance Digital nor NAPA Auto Parts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reliance Digital nor NAPA Auto Parts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reliance Digital nor NAPA Auto Parts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reliance Digital nor NAPA Auto Parts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References