Comparison Overview

Reliance Center

VS

Doctor Sam, LLC

Reliance Center

450 Sutter Street Suite 300, San Francisco, 94108, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The Reliance Center™ is an outpatient center specializing in the treatment of opiate dependency for adults and adolescents. We offer a comprehensive program of medication assisted treatment, counseling and continuing care, provided in a compassionate, patient-centered setting. Reliance Center™ utilizes buprenorphine in the medical portion of our treatment program. Services are affordably priced and covered by most insurance programs Our goal is to help individuals address their Vicodin, Oxycontin, Lortab, Percoset, heroin and other opiate dependencies through an integrated program of medication and counseling, and by guiding them to a strong and effective relationship with an exceptional addiction treatment provider. Services are provided in a comfortable medical office suite, conveniently located in downtown San Francisco. Services include: • Medically Assisted Withdrawal • Continuing Medication Support • Routine Physician Visits • Group, Individual and Family Counseling • Acupuncture, Shiatsu Massage and Chiropractic Care • 24/7 Access to Counseling Staff

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Doctor Sam, LLC

2600 N Military Trail, Boca Raton, 33431, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Doctor Sam, LLC is a mental health care company devoted to providing individualized treatment to children, adolescents and adults in the South Florida community. Founder, Samantha Saltz, MD, is an award winning, published, child, adolescent and adult psychiatrist. She serves on voluntary faculty at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. Her company offers medication management, psychodynamic therapy, supportive therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, life coaching and tele psychiatry services to patients. Patients of Doctor Sam, LLC develop a unique alliance with their provider and truly feel comfortable speaking with Doctor Sam. Through a professional lens, Doctor Sam will gently guide you to finding tools that will help you in your day-to-day life. Doctor Sam will reinforce your strengths and help you identify energy that you did not know existed. Call 561-510-9150 to make your appointment today.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-center.jpeg
Reliance Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctor-sam-llc.jpeg
Doctor Sam, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reliance Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Doctor Sam, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doctor Sam, LLC in 2026.

Incident History — Reliance Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Doctor Sam, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doctor Sam, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-center.jpeg
Reliance Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctor-sam-llc.jpeg
Doctor Sam, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reliance Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Doctor Sam, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Doctor Sam, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reliance Center company.

In the current year, Doctor Sam, LLC company and Reliance Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Doctor Sam, LLC company nor Reliance Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Doctor Sam, LLC company nor Reliance Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Doctor Sam, LLC company nor Reliance Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reliance Center company nor Doctor Sam, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reliance Center nor Doctor Sam, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reliance Center company nor Doctor Sam, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reliance Center company employs more people globally than Doctor Sam, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Reliance Center nor Doctor Sam, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reliance Center nor Doctor Sam, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reliance Center nor Doctor Sam, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reliance Center nor Doctor Sam, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reliance Center nor Doctor Sam, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reliance Center nor Doctor Sam, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N