Comparison Overview

Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc.

VS

Print Image Network Ltd

Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc.

85 Main Avenue, Elmwood Park, NJ, 07407, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Reliable Envelope provides exceptional full-service envelope printing. * Eight Halm Jets for 1-4 Color offset printing * Xante digital envelope press for short run full color envelopes and personalization * Full-service pre press * Full-service bindery * Direct mail services * Daily shipments via UPS or Fedex, local delivery on our truck, and warehouse storage Stationery packages available. Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. provides high quality printing and fulfillment services at competitive prices.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Print Image Network Ltd

10 Acorn Business Park, Heaton Lane, Stockport, SK4 1AS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Print Image Network Limited is an award-winning provider of local authority printing services. We have been working with local authorities for over 20 years and have developed an excellent reputation for our printing services and knowledge of the market. Today, we work with around 25% of local authorities, with a 100% track record of meeting delivery deadlines. Each year we produce millions of printed items for local authorities each year, including electoral mailings such as postal votes, ballot papers, poll cards, canvass forms for electoral registration, to benefit forms and letters, council tax billing and tenant communications such as rent statements. We are a customer-centric organisation and pride ourselves on delivering excellent customer service at all times. Each member of our team lives and breathes our core company values and is committed to providing the best possible service to local authority printing customer. A core part of our local authority printing service is the work we provide to electoral administration departments. Of all the areas of council print, electoral print is perhaps the most demanding and requires a specialist approach. Therefore, for 20 years we have equipped ourselves with knowledge, affiliations, people and technology it requires to service this market. Today, we are affiliated with the Cabinet Office, The Association of Electoral Administrators, and The Electoral Commission, to keep up to date with the latest legislation. When it comes to delivery, we employ people with a strong background in print and who share our company values. We have the latest printing technology and huge operational network to carry out local authority printing. Our qualified team is made up of print and mail specialists, alongside election experts. Each local authority printing customer will have a dedicated account manager who is a single point of contact.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliable-envelope-and-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-image-network.jpeg
Print Image Network Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Print Image Network Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print Image Network Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Print Image Network Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print Image Network Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliable-envelope-and-graphics-inc-.jpeg
Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-image-network.jpeg
Print Image Network Ltd
Incidents

FAQ

Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Print Image Network Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Print Image Network Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company.

In the current year, Print Image Network Ltd company and Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Print Image Network Ltd company nor Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Print Image Network Ltd company nor Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Print Image Network Ltd company nor Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company nor Print Image Network Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. nor Print Image Network Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company nor Print Image Network Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Print Image Network Ltd company employs more people globally than Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. nor Print Image Network Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. nor Print Image Network Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. nor Print Image Network Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. nor Print Image Network Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. nor Print Image Network Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reliable Envelope and Graphics, Inc. nor Print Image Network Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L