Comparison Overview

Reliable Bail Bonds

VS

Innovative Trial Services

Reliable Bail Bonds

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Scott Burn has owned Reliable Bail Bonds in Georgetown, Texas for over 29 years. He has lived in Williamson County for the same amount of time. Scott graduated from Angelo State University in 1987 with a Bachelor’s of Business Administration, and has worked in the public sector for over 10 years in financial and accounting positions. Scott also obtained his CPA certificate in 1994. Scott was first elected to the Williamson County Bail Bond Board in January 2007, and has been a member of The Professional Bondsman of Texas – the PBT – since 2000. Scott and his staff are committed to providing fast, professional, and confidential service to all of our current and future clients in the Georgetown, Texas area.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Innovative Trial Services

undefined, Milwaukee, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

As 2016 begins, so does Innovative Trial Services. The idea to create ITS began several years ago when its founders, all well respected leaders in the industry who were at that time working for large companies, began to talk about creating a trial boutique. Our goal was to create a realistic dream team consisting of the best of the best in order to provide our clients with the highest level of service available in the industry. We decided to focus our practice on providing our clients with the two things we do best; providing innovative graphics that win cases and presenting them at trial using the best technology available. If you are looking for a team with extensive experience that has worked on over one thousand trials, who will integrate seamlessly with your team, then give us a call.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliable-bail-bonds.jpeg
Reliable Bail Bonds
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/innovative-trial-services.jpeg
Innovative Trial Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reliable Bail Bonds
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Innovative Trial Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliable Bail Bonds in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Innovative Trial Services in 2025.

Incident History — Reliable Bail Bonds (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliable Bail Bonds cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Innovative Trial Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Innovative Trial Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliable-bail-bonds.jpeg
Reliable Bail Bonds
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/innovative-trial-services.jpeg
Innovative Trial Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Reliable Bail Bonds company and Innovative Trial Services company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Innovative Trial Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reliable Bail Bonds company.

In the current year, Innovative Trial Services company and Reliable Bail Bonds company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Innovative Trial Services company nor Reliable Bail Bonds company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Innovative Trial Services company nor Reliable Bail Bonds company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Innovative Trial Services company nor Reliable Bail Bonds company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds company nor Innovative Trial Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds nor Innovative Trial Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds company nor Innovative Trial Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Reliable Bail Bonds company and Innovative Trial Services company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds nor Innovative Trial Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds nor Innovative Trial Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds nor Innovative Trial Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds nor Innovative Trial Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds nor Innovative Trial Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reliable Bail Bonds nor Innovative Trial Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X