Comparison Overview

Relevant Industrial, LLC

VS

Baker Hughes

Relevant Industrial, LLC

9750 W Sam Houston Pkwy N, None, Houston, Texas, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

Relevant Solutions is the preferred provider of process equipment solutions. Every solution we deliver is specialized and customized for each demanding situation a client presents to us. We leverage the vast experience and knowledge gained across our combined histories to provide exceptional solutions, without exception. We continually sharpen our edge with new expertise, and we’re always at the ready, focused on the most important job at hand – keeping our customers up and running. Our unique platform allows us to integrate our resources, capabilities and industry-specific experience to solve your greatest needs – whatever the need, whatever the industry. Our people are what makes us Relevant. Legendary. Innovative. Ingenious. Hardworking. Solution driven. Customer focused. The kind of people who never say “never” and instead reply, “We’ll find a way.” Relevant provides solutions through our Instrumentation and Automation, Rotating Equipment, Thermal Equipment, and Purification offerings. We don’t just sell parts and service to our customers; we help them realize new and better ways to run more efficiently. Contact us at [email protected].

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 565
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Baker Hughes

17021 Aldine Westfield, Houston, Texas, 77073, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Baker Hughes (NASDAQ: BKR) is an energy technology company that provides solutions for energy and industrial customers worldwide. Built on a century of experience and conducting business in over 120 countries, our innovative technologies and services are taking energy forward – making it safer, cleaner and more efficient for people and the planet. For more than a century, our inventions have revolutionized energy. We harness the power of engineering, data, and science to redefine what's possible. Our diverse portfolio of equipment and service capabilities span the energy and industrial value chain. Our two operating segments, Oilfield Services & Equipment (OFSE) and Industrial & Energy Technology (IET), are organized based on the nature of our markets and customers, and consist of similar products and services. Visit us at bakerhughes.com to learn more.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 65,278
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/relevantsolutionsllc.jpeg
Relevant Industrial, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhge.jpeg
Baker Hughes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Relevant Industrial, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baker Hughes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Relevant Industrial, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baker Hughes in 2025.

Incident History — Relevant Industrial, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Relevant Industrial, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baker Hughes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baker Hughes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/relevantsolutionsllc.jpeg
Relevant Industrial, LLC
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bhge.jpeg
Baker Hughes
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Baker Hughes company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Relevant Industrial, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Relevant Industrial, LLC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Baker Hughes company has not reported any.

In the current year, Baker Hughes company and Relevant Industrial, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baker Hughes company nor Relevant Industrial, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Relevant Industrial, LLC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Baker Hughes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Baker Hughes company nor Relevant Industrial, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC company nor Baker Hughes company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC nor Baker Hughes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Baker Hughes company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Relevant Industrial, LLC company.

Baker Hughes company employs more people globally than Relevant Industrial, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC nor Baker Hughes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC nor Baker Hughes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC nor Baker Hughes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC nor Baker Hughes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC nor Baker Hughes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Relevant Industrial, LLC nor Baker Hughes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H