Comparison Overview

Reindl Bindery

VS

Sentinel Printing Company

Reindl Bindery

W194N11381 McCormick Drive, Germantown, WI, 53022, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.reindlbindery.com

Founded in 1978, Reindl Bindery has become a respected leader in the printing and publishing industries. Reindl is known for award-winning quality, responsive service, and innovative binding solutions. We continue to be one of the leading trade binderies in the nation specializing in hard cover binding, cover wrapping and lining along with the mounting of media components such as CD/DVD trays and booklets, perfect binding and mechanical binding. With a diverse range of capabilities, Reindl can offer solutions for your most unique binding needs. You can always depend on Reindl for reliable service and knowledgeable, friendly support. Explore the possibilities and discover why Reindl Bindery is "First in Quality...Bound to Last."

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sentinel Printing Company

250 N Hwy 10, Saint Cloud, MN, 56304, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sentinelprinting.com

Book manufacturing and print solutions company offering book manufacturing for publishers and JIT manufacturing programs of owner's manual kit assemblies for national product lines including inventory management. Sentinel also manufactures catalogs, manuals, testing and financial materials as well as commercial printing. We also provide kitting and order fulfillment. Sentinel Printing is a CJK Group, Inc company. CJK Group Inc. is a technology based parent company to numerous independently managed communications and manufacturing plants nationwide. CJK Group combines the personal attention of each company with the strength of an industry-leader in technology to the communications industry. www.cjkgroup.com Printing Services Available: Offset and Digital One to Four color printing options Binding Adhesive-Perfect (soft) Bound Saddle Stitch Plastic Coil Wire-O

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reindl-bindery-co-inc.jpeg
Reindl Bindery
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sentinel-printing-co-inc-.jpeg
Sentinel Printing Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reindl Bindery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sentinel Printing Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reindl Bindery in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sentinel Printing Company in 2025.

Incident History — Reindl Bindery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reindl Bindery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sentinel Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sentinel Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reindl-bindery-co-inc.jpeg
Reindl Bindery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sentinel-printing-co-inc-.jpeg
Sentinel Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Reindl Bindery company and Sentinel Printing Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Sentinel Printing Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reindl Bindery company.

In the current year, Sentinel Printing Company company and Reindl Bindery company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sentinel Printing Company company nor Reindl Bindery company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sentinel Printing Company company nor Reindl Bindery company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sentinel Printing Company company nor Reindl Bindery company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reindl Bindery company nor Sentinel Printing Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reindl Bindery nor Sentinel Printing Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reindl Bindery company nor Sentinel Printing Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sentinel Printing Company company employs more people globally than Reindl Bindery company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Reindl Bindery nor Sentinel Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reindl Bindery nor Sentinel Printing Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reindl Bindery nor Sentinel Printing Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reindl Bindery nor Sentinel Printing Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reindl Bindery nor Sentinel Printing Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reindl Bindery nor Sentinel Printing Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References