Comparison Overview

RTRLAW

VS

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors

RTRLAW

3333 W Commercial Blvd, Ste. 200B, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 33309, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to RTRLAW, a premier full-service law firm established in 1988. RTRLAW is committed to providing outstanding representation and personalized legal services to each of our clients. GO WITH EXPERIENCE. RTRLAW has been practicing law for over three decades and we are proud to be a FULL-SERVICE LAW FIRM. For more than 35 years, RTRLAW has expanded our capabilities beyond imagination with the latest technology, cutting-edge data bases and investigation tools, which gives us an edge over most firms to achieve the best results. With offices in Ft. Lauderdale, Lake Worth, Orlando, Tampa, Garland, Texas, and by appointment only in Jacksonville, Miami, and Dallas, RTRLAW has the capability to meet clients in North, Central and South Florida and the Dallas metro area, providing efficiency with ACCESSIBILITY, DETERMINATION AND AGGRESSIVENESS. The attorneys and legal staff at RTRLAW understand that finding an attorney can often be a bit overwhelming - even intimidating. The law can be very complex, involving tough decisions that carry lasting consequences. You'll receive a free case review and if your case involves an injury, you won't pay any fees unless and until we win your case and recover money for you. Call or text our 24-hour EMERGENCY TOLL-FREE HOTLINE at 1-833-HIRE-RTR for assistance now. There are important things you need to know after you have suffered injuries in an accident. It is very important to contact an attorney as soon after an accident as possible, and especially before you discuss the facts with either the other party’s insurance adjuster or your own. Never give a recorded statement to any insurance company representative without first speaking with one of our lawyers. We're available at your convenience - if you aren't available by phone or video conference, you can meet with an attorney at one of our offices or we will come to you!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Forster Dean Solicitors specialise in all types of Accident Claims. Whatever type of accident you have had, our specialist Lawyers can help you! With offices in the North West, why not pop into your local branch and see how we can help you. All our staff are friendly, approachable, professional, and will explain everything to you in plain English – no legal jargon! We pride ourselves on providing the very highest standards of service and client care is our number one priority. Don’t just take our word for it, click here to read about what our clients say about us! http://www.forsterdean.co.uk/category/testimonials/ Thinking of Moving House? Our experienced, dedicated property Lawyers will not only put your mind at ease but will keep you updated every step of the way. We are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA – registration number 517355) For more information, please visit our website or call us on 0151 422 0982. You can also email [email protected]

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reifkind-thompson-&-rudzinski.jpeg
RTRLAW
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forster-dean-limited-solicitors.jpeg
Forster Dean Limited Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RTRLAW
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Forster Dean Limited Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RTRLAW in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forster Dean Limited Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — RTRLAW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RTRLAW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Forster Dean Limited Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forster Dean Limited Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reifkind-thompson-&-rudzinski.jpeg
RTRLAW
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forster-dean-limited-solicitors.jpeg
Forster Dean Limited Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RTRLAW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RTRLAW company.

In the current year, Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company and RTRLAW company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company nor RTRLAW company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company nor RTRLAW company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company nor RTRLAW company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RTRLAW company nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RTRLAW nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RTRLAW company nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RTRLAW company employs more people globally than Forster Dean Limited Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither RTRLAW nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RTRLAW nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RTRLAW nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RTRLAW nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RTRLAW nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RTRLAW nor Forster Dean Limited Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X