Comparison Overview

Regulated United Europe

VS

DFA Law LLP

Regulated United Europe

Na Perštýně 342/1, Staré Město, Prague, CZ, 110 00
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Since 2017, FinTech lawyers united in the RUE (Regulated United Europe) began to assist in the licensing of crypto projects in Estonia. With the experience of participating in FinTech conferences around the world and helping to obtain a large number of crypto licenses in Estonia and Lithuania, our team has gained vast experience and partners around the world in the field of finance and blockchain. After more than 5 years of successful activity, the number of cryptocurrency jurisdictions we offer has expanded significantly, and now we are pleased to offer the implementation of the project in any EU country where there is a legal field for cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DFA Law LLP

2 Waterside Way, Northampton, undefined, NN4 7XD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

DFA Law has been advising clients in Northamptonshire, and across the region, for over 180 years. Today the firm is a blend of modern and traditional; a progressive, dynamic law firm which adheres to the old fashioned principles of professional integrity and personal service. We are able to assist most individuals or businesses no matter what their legal query and on those rare occasions where we are not able to assist, we have a strong network of professional colleagues who we can introduce to you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regulated-united-europe.jpeg
Regulated United Europe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dfa-law-llp.jpeg
DFA Law LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Regulated United Europe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DFA Law LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regulated United Europe in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DFA Law LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Regulated United Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regulated United Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DFA Law LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DFA Law LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regulated-united-europe.jpeg
Regulated United Europe
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dfa-law-llp.jpeg
DFA Law LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DFA Law LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Regulated United Europe company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DFA Law LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Regulated United Europe company.

In the current year, DFA Law LLP company and Regulated United Europe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DFA Law LLP company nor Regulated United Europe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DFA Law LLP company nor Regulated United Europe company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DFA Law LLP company nor Regulated United Europe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Regulated United Europe company nor DFA Law LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Regulated United Europe nor DFA Law LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Regulated United Europe company nor DFA Law LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DFA Law LLP company employs more people globally than Regulated United Europe company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Regulated United Europe nor DFA Law LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Regulated United Europe nor DFA Law LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Regulated United Europe nor DFA Law LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Regulated United Europe nor DFA Law LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Regulated United Europe nor DFA Law LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Regulated United Europe nor DFA Law LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X