Comparison Overview

Regis Resources Ltd

VS

OCP Group

Regis Resources Ltd

PO Box, Laverton, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Regis Resources (ASX: RRL) has grown from humble beginnings to become one of Australia's premier gold producers and explorers. We operate within two distinct project areas at Duketon gold project in the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australia while progressing the McPhillamys gold project in the Central Western region of New South Wales. Our purpose is to create value for our people, our communities and our shareholders via safe, responsible and reliable production performance. We do this by putting into practice the values which guide us; respect, integrity, teamwork, ownership and courage.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 331
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

OCP Group

2-4, rue Al Abtal, Hay Erraha, 20200, Casablanca, Maroc, Casablanca, 20000, MA
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Morocco, OCP Group is one of the world’s largest custodian and supplier of phosphate-based plant nutrition solutions and associated products for soil health and a leader in applied science and education. Our mission is to provide customized plant nutrition solutions for healthy food production. As an African business, we are committed to accelerating Africa’s development and south-to-south cooperation and making agriculture and food systems globally sustainable and resilient. We put farmers at the center of everything we do. Join us to help ensure a more sustainable and food secure future for all.

NAICS: 212
NAICS Definition: Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees: 12,483
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regis-resources.jpeg
Regis Resources Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocpgroup.jpeg
OCP Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Regis Resources Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OCP Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regis Resources Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Mining Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OCP Group in 2026.

Incident History — Regis Resources Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regis Resources Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OCP Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OCP Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/regis-resources.jpeg
Regis Resources Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocpgroup.jpeg
OCP Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

OCP Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Regis Resources Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Regis Resources Ltd company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas OCP Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, OCP Group company and Regis Resources Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Regis Resources Ltd company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while OCP Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither OCP Group company nor Regis Resources Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OCP Group company nor Regis Resources Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd company nor OCP Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd nor OCP Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd company nor OCP Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OCP Group company employs more people globally than Regis Resources Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mining.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd nor OCP Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd nor OCP Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd nor OCP Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd nor OCP Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd nor OCP Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Regis Resources Ltd nor OCP Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N