Comparison Overview

Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC

VS

Stanford Consulting Group, Inc.

Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC

470 Main Street, Ridgefield, CT, US, 06877
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For more than seventy years, Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison LLC has represented individuals, fiduciaries and business entities in th eareas of estate planning, estate and trust administration, conservatorships, guardianships and elder law, residential real estate, commercial real estate, business law and business transactions. Our roots date back to the 1930s when the firm was originally known as Morse & Marvin and located in New Canaan, Connecticut. We opened our Ridgefield offices in the 1980s and have become a respected presence on the Main Street of Ridgefield over the last 25 plus years. While the firm continues to maintain offices in New Canaan and serve the needs of its clients in New Canaan and nearby towns, our primary offices today are located in Ridgefield. While the majority of our clients reside in Ridgefield and nearby lower Fairfield County towns, we represent our clients through Connecticut as necessary. At Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC, we are committed to providing our clients sophisticated legal services in a timely and efficient matter.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stanford Consulting Group, Inc.

702 Marshall St., Redwood City, CA, 94063, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. provides research, analysis and expert testimony in complex business litigation and regulatory proceedings. SCG also provides investigation of economic issues of concern to business or government entities and offers conceptual as well as analytical solutions. Clients have relied on SCG for expert analysis and opinion since 1981, including in a number of the most significant cases of the past twenty-five years.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-consulting-group.jpeg
Stanford Consulting Group, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stanford Consulting Group, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-consulting-group.jpeg
Stanford Consulting Group, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company.

In the current year, Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company and Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company nor Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company nor Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company nor Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC company employs more people globally than Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reese, Hirsch, Shoults & Harrison, LLC nor Stanford Consulting Group, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X