Comparison Overview

Rees Companies

VS

BRI, A Cogent Company

Rees Companies

35 w Third ave, Collegeville, PA, 19426, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Every job Every time Everywhere Full-service capabilities for all phases of heavy industrial, mechanical And electrical contracting. . . . At their very best. Company Vision The Rees Companies Vision is to provide heavy industrial, mechanical, piping and electrical contracting and equipment installation, plant maintenance, and fabrication at its very best. With more than 80 years of combined experience, we know how to get the job done.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BRI, A Cogent Company

1550 Larkin Williams Rd., Fenton, MO, 63026, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

BRI specializes in the application and service of fluid pumping and treatment equipment and serves as a regional distributor of rotating equipment. We feature the most extensive capabilities for Industrial and Commercial customers while keeping the same personalized local service our customers have come to expect. We have served the Industrial, Mining, Oil & Gas markets as the dominant provider of creatively engineered pumping and process solutions since 1967. BRI, a Cogent company, is one of 11 best-in-class partner companies providing pumping and process equipment solutions and service to the Oil & Gas, Petrochemical, Water and Wastewater treatment industries.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rees-companies.jpeg
Rees Companies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bri-cogent.jpeg
BRI, A Cogent Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rees Companies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BRI, A Cogent Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rees Companies in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BRI, A Cogent Company in 2025.

Incident History — Rees Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rees Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BRI, A Cogent Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BRI, A Cogent Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rees-companies.jpeg
Rees Companies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bri-cogent.jpeg
BRI, A Cogent Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rees Companies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BRI, A Cogent Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BRI, A Cogent Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rees Companies company.

In the current year, BRI, A Cogent Company company and Rees Companies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BRI, A Cogent Company company nor Rees Companies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BRI, A Cogent Company company nor Rees Companies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BRI, A Cogent Company company nor Rees Companies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rees Companies company nor BRI, A Cogent Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rees Companies nor BRI, A Cogent Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rees Companies company nor BRI, A Cogent Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BRI, A Cogent Company company employs more people globally than Rees Companies company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Rees Companies nor BRI, A Cogent Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rees Companies nor BRI, A Cogent Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rees Companies nor BRI, A Cogent Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rees Companies nor BRI, A Cogent Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rees Companies nor BRI, A Cogent Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rees Companies nor BRI, A Cogent Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H