Comparison Overview

Reedy Photo

VS

Kelly Williams Photography

Reedy Photo

12125 28th Street North, St. Petersburg, FL, 33716, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Reedy Photo has been here since nearly the start of the photo industry as a professional finishing photo lab. Our company was founded in 1917 by E.M. Reedy in Minneapolis. It has since been many names and we are located in St. Petersburg, Florida. At Reedy Photo, Creative Meets Quality... Fulfill your creative vision in a tangible and lasting way. We handcraft our products from the finest professional materials. Color accuracy and consistency are always priority. See your art at its very best, just the way you intend it to be.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kelly Williams Photography

1204 Griffin St W, Dallas, 75215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15

My photos get YOU noticed! ✨ Dallas-based commercial photographer specializing in Lifestyle Ads, Branding Collateral, Businesses, Media Personalities, Authors, Actors, Entertainers, and Models. Your face is your brand. Customers naturally gravitate toward businesses they “know.” There is no better way to display the personality of your business than your face, as a business headshot individualizes a company. The moment a business sets up residence in someone’s heart, you have a loyal customer for life. A great business portrait will make that happen! Call or email for a quote today! 972 885 7169 [email protected]

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reedyphoto.jpeg
Reedy Photo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kelly-williams-photography.jpeg
Kelly Williams Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reedy Photo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kelly Williams Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reedy Photo in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kelly Williams Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Reedy Photo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reedy Photo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kelly Williams Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kelly Williams Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reedyphoto.jpeg
Reedy Photo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kelly-williams-photography.jpeg
Kelly Williams Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Reedy Photo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kelly Williams Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kelly Williams Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reedy Photo company.

In the current year, Kelly Williams Photography company and Reedy Photo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kelly Williams Photography company nor Reedy Photo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kelly Williams Photography company nor Reedy Photo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kelly Williams Photography company nor Reedy Photo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reedy Photo company nor Kelly Williams Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reedy Photo nor Kelly Williams Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reedy Photo company nor Kelly Williams Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kelly Williams Photography company employs more people globally than Reedy Photo company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Reedy Photo nor Kelly Williams Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reedy Photo nor Kelly Williams Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reedy Photo nor Kelly Williams Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reedy Photo nor Kelly Williams Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reedy Photo nor Kelly Williams Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reedy Photo nor Kelly Williams Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N