Comparison Overview

RedMart

VS

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)

RedMart

8 Shenton Way, Singapore, 068811, SG
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

RedMart is the supermarket arm of Lazada Group in Singapore, offering an unparalleled selection of quality fresh food, household essentials and premium speciality products with the convenience of scheduled home delivery seven days a week, all year round. To find out more about career opportunities at RedMart, please visit the Lazada LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/lazada

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 529
Subsidiaries: 25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)

800 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, CT, 06854, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Booking Holdings is the world’s leading provider of online travel & related services, provided to consumers and local partners in more than 220 countries and territories through six primary consumer-facing brands: Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, Rentalcars.com, KAYAK and OpenTable. Collectively, Booking Holdings operates in more than 40 languages across Europe, North America, South America, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East and Africa. The mission of Booking Holdings is to make it easier for everyone to experience the world.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16,824
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redmart.jpeg
RedMart
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bookingholdings.jpeg
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RedMart
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RedMart in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) in 2025.

Incident History — RedMart (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RedMart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redmart.jpeg
RedMart
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Theft of Customer Information
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bookingholdings.jpeg
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Mass-phishing, Infostealer trojans
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: compromised email accounts, phishing links, fake reCAPTCHA challenge, malware download (PureRAT), personalized WhatsApp messages, fake Booking/Expedia websites
Motivation: financial gain, data theft, fraudulent transactions
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: malicious domain registration, social engineering, phishing emails/websites
Motivation: financial gain, theft of payment details
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RedMart company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to RedMart company.

In the current year, Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has reported more cyber incidents than RedMart company.

Neither Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company nor RedMart company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

RedMart company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while RedMart company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RedMart company nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RedMart nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RedMart company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company.

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) company employs more people globally than RedMart company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither RedMart nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RedMart nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RedMart nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RedMart nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RedMart nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RedMart nor Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H