Comparison Overview

Red Hook Labs

VS

Fotografa

Red Hook Labs

undefined, Brooklyn, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Labs is a public-benefit corporation located in Red Hook, Brooklyn which establishes arts education in public schools and community centers, provides accelerated skills training on its premises, and connects teens and young adults to internships and job opportunities in the creative industries. Labs is comprised of three individual Labs: Studio, School, Gallery. Each combine to make a truly dynamic and diverse space where the most talented emerging artists, alongside the most acclaimed, go to work, create, exhibit, teach, learn, collaborate, celebrate, employ and be employed.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fotografa

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Action IMAGES AND CREATIVITY for a powerful communication. As a photographer, i realize communication images for institutions, companies, vocal groups, and for professionals’ personal branding. I love all the way from a concept to search and development, i need to surf on creativity, to go deep and further.. i enjoy brainstorming and team work.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redhooklabs.jpeg
Red Hook Labs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotografa.jpeg
Fotografa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Red Hook Labs
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fotografa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Hook Labs in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fotografa in 2025.

Incident History — Red Hook Labs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Hook Labs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fotografa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fotografa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redhooklabs.jpeg
Red Hook Labs
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fotografa.jpeg
Fotografa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fotografa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Red Hook Labs company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fotografa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Red Hook Labs company.

In the current year, Fotografa company and Red Hook Labs company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fotografa company nor Red Hook Labs company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fotografa company nor Red Hook Labs company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fotografa company nor Red Hook Labs company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Red Hook Labs company nor Fotografa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Red Hook Labs nor Fotografa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Red Hook Labs company nor Fotografa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Red Hook Labs company employs more people globally than Fotografa company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Red Hook Labs nor Fotografa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Red Hook Labs nor Fotografa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Red Hook Labs nor Fotografa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Red Hook Labs nor Fotografa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Red Hook Labs nor Fotografa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Red Hook Labs nor Fotografa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N