Comparison Overview

Redemption Psychiatry

VS

Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics

Redemption Psychiatry

2730 S Val Vista Dr, Gilbert, 85295, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Vision: To redeem the practice of Psychiatry for providers and patients, remove any stigma towards mental illness, and stay at the forefront of advancements in Psychiatric treatment. Redemption Psychiatry is an outpatient psychiatric group, founded by Jason Friday, MD. We specialize in TRD (Treatment Resistant Depression) and use a variety of non-medication treatments that really work! We accept nearly all commercial insurance plans but are not a Medicare or AHCCCS provider. We are one of the most affordable providers of IV Ketamine Infusion Therapy. We are the only TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) providers that use laser and image guidance for accurate coil placement and we offer additional enhancements to TMS treatment at no cost.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics

3051 Maple Loop, Lehi, Utah, 84043, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics provide individualized, compassionate care you can trust. We serve individuals across the lifespan from children through seniors, empowering them to overcome life’s challenges. Our clinical staff consists of specialists in a variety of areas, allowing us to match services to client needs. Religious, ethnic, and gender preferences are also all available upon request. Our goal is to partner with individuals and families to provide solutions for change and restore hope. We offer individual therapy, family therapy, marital therapy, group therapy, and medication services at our behavioral health clinics throughout Utah in Lehi, Salt Lake and Saint George. Ascendant is committed to providing the newest treatments that have demonstrated proven outcomes. We accept most insurances and offer reasonable self pay rates for clients without insurance.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redemption-psychiatry-llc.jpeg
Redemption Psychiatry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascendant-behavioral-health-clinics.jpeg
Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Redemption Psychiatry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Redemption Psychiatry in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics in 2026.

Incident History — Redemption Psychiatry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Redemption Psychiatry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redemption-psychiatry-llc.jpeg
Redemption Psychiatry
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascendant-behavioral-health-clinics.jpeg
Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Redemption Psychiatry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Redemption Psychiatry company.

In the current year, Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company and Redemption Psychiatry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company nor Redemption Psychiatry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company nor Redemption Psychiatry company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company nor Redemption Psychiatry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry company nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry company nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Redemption Psychiatry company employs more people globally than Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Redemption Psychiatry nor Ascendant Behavioral Health Clinics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N