Comparison Overview

Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

VS

Bousquet Holstein PLLC

Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

The White Chapel Building, London, London, E1 8QS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Reddie & Grose is a firm of European and UK intellectual property attorneys with a highly experienced and friendly team. Offering an integrated approach to IP, we are able to provide global protection for all aspects of patents, trade marks and designs. We work closely with a wide variety of businesses in a diverse range of subject matters. Since our foundation in 1907, we have continued to build long lasting relationships with our clients, which include some of the world’s best-known companies and brands.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bousquet Holstein PLLC

110 West Fayette Street, One Lincoln Center, Suite 1000, Syracuse, NY, US, 13202-1190
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

Bousquet Holstein PLLC is a full-service law firm in Syracuse and Ithaca, serving our clients across many industries. Our attorneys are more than legal professionals; they are dedicated counselors, strategists, and committed advocates for our clients. We work closely with our clients to build relationships that often span generations – grounded in trust established through deep understanding of their objectives and consistently exceptional service. With a team of over 50 attorneys, we offer counsel in more than 30 practice areas, including business, tax, employment and labor, family law, litigation, real estate, and trusts and estates. Through our interdisciplinary approach, we deliver innovative and comprehensive solutions tailored to our clients' needs.   To learn more about our legal services, please visit www.bhlawpllc.com.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reddie-&-grose.jpeg
Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bousquet-holstein-pllc.jpeg
Bousquet Holstein PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bousquet Holstein PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bousquet Holstein PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bousquet Holstein PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bousquet Holstein PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reddie-&-grose.jpeg
Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bousquet-holstein-pllc.jpeg
Bousquet Holstein PLLC
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bousquet Holstein PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Bousquet Holstein PLLC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bousquet Holstein PLLC company and Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bousquet Holstein PLLC company nor Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bousquet Holstein PLLC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bousquet Holstein PLLC company nor Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys company employs more people globally than Bousquet Holstein PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reddie & Grose Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys nor Bousquet Holstein PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X