Comparison Overview

The Red Cedar Log

VS

Risk Management Magazine

The Red Cedar Log

311 Student Services, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

The Red Cedar Log, the official yearbook of Michigan State University, is an award-winning, comprehensive collection of the Spartan experience. It is one of the university's oldest publications: a running story of MSU told by and for the students. We honor this story, and we recognize that it does not end. The 392-page book is published annually and boasts some of the best in student design, photography, and content in the country. Red Cedar Log staffers spend the school year documenting campus life, student organizations, varsity sports and colleges, seeking to capture both the momentary and the timeless. The final product is a piece of history, an enduring account of the people, places and events that shaped us.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Risk Management Magazine

undefined, New York, NY, 10018, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Risk Management is the premier publication of analysis, insight and news for the risk management community. Since 1954, Risk Management has explored the emerging concepts and strategies used by those tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their organizations. Risk Management is published 10 times annually by the Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS).

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redcedarlog.jpeg
The Red Cedar Log
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/risk-management-magazine.jpeg
Risk Management Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Red Cedar Log
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Risk Management Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Red Cedar Log in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Risk Management Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — The Red Cedar Log (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Red Cedar Log cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Risk Management Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Risk Management Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redcedarlog.jpeg
The Red Cedar Log
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/risk-management-magazine.jpeg
Risk Management Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Red Cedar Log company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Risk Management Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Risk Management Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Red Cedar Log company.

In the current year, Risk Management Magazine company and The Red Cedar Log company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Risk Management Magazine company nor The Red Cedar Log company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Risk Management Magazine company nor The Red Cedar Log company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Risk Management Magazine company nor The Red Cedar Log company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Red Cedar Log company nor Risk Management Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Risk Management Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Red Cedar Log company nor Risk Management Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Red Cedar Log company employs more people globally than Risk Management Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Risk Management Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Risk Management Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Risk Management Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Risk Management Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Risk Management Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Risk Management Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.