Comparison Overview

The Red Cedar Log

VS

Cell Press

The Red Cedar Log

311 Student Services, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://asmsu.msu.edu/home/departments/the-red-cedar-log/

The Red Cedar Log, the official yearbook of Michigan State University, is an award-winning, comprehensive collection of the Spartan experience. It is one of the university's oldest publications: a running story of MSU told by and for the students. We honor this story, and we recognize that it does not end. The 392-page book is published annually and boasts some of the best in student design, photography, and content in the country. Red Cedar Log staffers spend the school year documenting campus life, student organizations, varsity sports and colleges, seeking to capture both the momentary and the timeless. The final product is a piece of history, an enduring account of the people, places and events that shaped us.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cell Press

50 Hampshire St., Cambridge, 02139, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cell.com/about

Cell Press publishes over 50 scientific journals across the life, physical, earth, and health sciences, both independently and in partnership with scientific societies. Our story began over 45 years ago with the journal Cell and a commitment to publishing exciting biology. Today, we are bringing our editorial excellence, commitment to innovation, unparalleled reach and visibility, and passion for advocacy to all areas of scientific exploration as we work to publish and share science that inspires. To learn more, visit www.cell.com/about.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 409
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redcedarlog.jpeg
The Red Cedar Log
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cell-press.jpeg
Cell Press
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Red Cedar Log
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cell Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Red Cedar Log in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cell Press in 2025.

Incident History — The Red Cedar Log (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Red Cedar Log cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cell Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cell Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redcedarlog.jpeg
The Red Cedar Log
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cell-press.jpeg
Cell Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cell Press company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Red Cedar Log company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cell Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Red Cedar Log company.

In the current year, Cell Press company and The Red Cedar Log company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cell Press company nor The Red Cedar Log company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cell Press company nor The Red Cedar Log company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cell Press company nor The Red Cedar Log company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Red Cedar Log company nor Cell Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Cell Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cell Press company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Red Cedar Log company.

Cell Press company employs more people globally than The Red Cedar Log company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Cell Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Cell Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Cell Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Cell Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Cell Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Red Cedar Log nor Cell Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References