Comparison Overview

Red Barrel Creative

VS

Havas

Red Barrel Creative

None, None, Los Angeles, California, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

We get gameplay. We get marketing. We get development. Forged from 20+ years of combined experience in video game marketing, Red Barrel Creative is a collective focused on inspiring, innovative and effective campaigns designed to reach a new generation of gamers.of gamers.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Havas

29/30 Quai de Dion Bouton, Puteaux, undefined, 92800, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

TO MAKE A MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE TO BRANDS, TO BUSINESSES AND TO PEOPLE Founded in 1835 in Paris, Havas is one of the world’s largest global communications networks, with more than 23,000 people in over 100 markets sharing one single mission: to make a meaningful difference to brands, businesses, and people. Havas has developed a seamlessly integrated global strategy and operating system, Converged, designed to answer clients’ needs for standout, cross-functional, end-to-end communications solutions, supercharged by data, tech and AI, but powered by humans. Through its 70+ Havas Villages around the world, covering all communication activities, Havas’ teams work together with agility and in perfect synergy to offer tailor-made, innovative solutions to clients that support them in their positive transformation. Havas is committed to building a diverse culture where everybody feels they belong and can be themselves and thrive.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,194
Subsidiaries: 95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redbarrelcreative.jpeg
Red Barrel Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/havas.jpeg
Havas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Red Barrel Creative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Havas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Barrel Creative in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Havas in 2025.

Incident History — Red Barrel Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Barrel Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Havas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Havas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redbarrelcreative.jpeg
Red Barrel Creative
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/havas.jpeg
Havas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Havas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Red Barrel Creative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Red Barrel Creative company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Havas company has not reported any.

In the current year, Havas company and Red Barrel Creative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Red Barrel Creative company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Havas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Havas company nor Red Barrel Creative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Havas company nor Red Barrel Creative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Red Barrel Creative company nor Havas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor Havas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Havas company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Red Barrel Creative company.

Havas company employs more people globally than Red Barrel Creative company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor Havas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor Havas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor Havas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor Havas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor Havas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor Havas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X