Comparison Overview

Red Barrel Creative

VS

dentsu

Red Barrel Creative

None, None, Los Angeles, California, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

We get gameplay. We get marketing. We get development. Forged from 20+ years of combined experience in video game marketing, Red Barrel Creative is a collective focused on inspiring, innovative and effective campaigns designed to reach a new generation of gamers.of gamers.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, undefined, undefined, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern creativity. We are the network designed for what’s next.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 17,322
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redbarrelcreative.jpeg
Red Barrel Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu-aegis-network.jpeg
dentsu
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Red Barrel Creative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
dentsu
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Barrel Creative in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dentsu in 2025.

Incident History — Red Barrel Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Barrel Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redbarrelcreative.jpeg
Red Barrel Creative
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu-aegis-network.jpeg
dentsu
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

dentsu company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Red Barrel Creative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

dentsu company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Red Barrel Creative company.

In the current year, dentsu company has reported more cyber incidents than Red Barrel Creative company.

Red Barrel Creative company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while dentsu company has not reported such incidents publicly.

dentsu company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Red Barrel Creative company has not reported such incidents publicly.

dentsu company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Red Barrel Creative company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Red Barrel Creative company nor dentsu company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor dentsu holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

dentsu company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Red Barrel Creative company.

dentsu company employs more people globally than Red Barrel Creative company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor dentsu holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor dentsu holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor dentsu holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Red Barrel Creative nor dentsu holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X