Comparison Overview

Red Robin

VS

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

Red Robin

6312 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Greenwood Village, CO, 80111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Since opening in 1969 in Seattle, Washington, Red Robin has welcomed Guests to our casual dining restaurants in the U.S. and Canada, connecting people around craveable food and fun in a relaxed, playful atmosphere. Our people are the foundation of our success. We aim to be an inclusive employer of choice by encouraging diversity, offering competitive pay and rewarding career paths. We strive to employ Team Members who are a reflection of our Guests and the communities we serve. Mission: Serve our Guests awesome American food and bottomless fun. Vision: Be the most loved restaurant brand in the communities we serve. We WIN TOGETHER when we live our values: BOTTOMLESS FUN: From our unique art, to our iconic mascot, to our endless fries – we like to have fun. Our playful attitude impacts all aspects of our business, ensuring both Team Members and Guests have a great time. UNBRIDLED GENEROSITY: By providing boundless kindness, abundance in service, and a “do-whatever-it-takes” attitude and hospitality, we ensure that our Team Members are equipped and excited to care for our guests. FAMILIARITY WITH A TWIST: Red Robin feels different, but still like home. Our decor, recipes, and Team Members blend the familiar with the unknown to create new and interesting experiences. INTEGRITY & HIGH-PERFORMANCE: Every action is driven by unwavering integrity, setting a new benchmark for high performance, ensuring excellence in all endeavors and fostering a culture of trust and excellence.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 13,181
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

5200 Buffington Road, None, Atlanta, GA, US, 30349
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At its Atlanta headquarters, known as the Corporate Support Center, Chick-fil-A, Inc. offers full-time careers in various fields such as Digital Transformation & Technology, Financial Services & Accounting, Enterprise Analytics, Restaurant Development, Early Talent Programs and more. Our team of more than 3,000 staff members tackles complex challenges every day — from restaurant design to food innovation, to infusing personalized service into digital spaces — all with the intent of supporting our owner-operators in delivering customer experiences defined by hospitality and care. Chick-fil-A, Inc. is the third largest quick-service restaurant company in the United States, known for its freshly-prepared food, signature hospitality and unique franchise model. More than 200,000 Team Members are employed by independent owner-operators in more than 3,000 restaurants across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. In 2023, the company shared plans to expand by 2030 into Europe and Asia. Chick-fil-A owner-operators live and work in the communities their restaurants serve, each supporting local efforts to address hunger, education, and making a positive impact. The family-owned and privately held company was founded in 1967 by S. Truett Cathy.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 79,628
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-robin.jpeg
Red Robin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chick-fil-a-corporate.jpeg
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Red Robin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Robin in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center in 2025.

Incident History — Red Robin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Robin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-robin.jpeg
Red Robin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chick-fil-a-corporate.jpeg
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Red Robin company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Red Robin company has not reported any.

In the current year, Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company and Red Robin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company nor Red Robin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Red Robin company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company nor Red Robin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Red Robin company nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Red Robin nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Red Robin company nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company employs more people globally than Red Robin company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Red Robin nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Red Robin nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Red Robin nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Red Robin nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Red Robin nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Red Robin nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H