Comparison Overview

Red Line Editorial

VS

CCC Ringgold Solutions

Red Line Editorial

2297 Waters Dr, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, 55120, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Our beginnings are humble: just the founder in an 8-by-10 space in an unfinished basement in 1998. Today, Red Line Editorial is a full-service editorial house serving traditional and digital publishers. We’ve done some big things, but we’re still small. Each year our team produces more than 500 books, most of them for the K-12 educational market. We work with publishers big and small to concept, develop, and produce content that engages and enlightens. Product development, marketing, and digital hosting services ensure you find the audience you’re looking for. In addition to book development, RLE also continues our long tradition of producing journalistic sports stories for clients ranging from grassroots organizations to the US Olympic & Paralympic Team. We’re still a small company proudly based in Minneapolis-St. Paul, but we do big things for our clients.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CCC Ringgold Solutions

undefined, Beaverton, OR, undefined, undefined
Last Update: 2025-11-27

On 3 May, 2022, CCC acquired Ringgold, a longstanding provider of persistent organization identifiers widely used by the scholarly communications community. With offices in the US and UK, Ringgold is now a wholly owned subsidiary of CCC. Enhanced data quality is a differentiator, powering solutions in the scholarly communications landscape. Persistent identifiers (PIDs) that are globally unique and associated with accurate metadata about an article, a grant, a person, a project, or an organization, play a vital role in the ecosystem. Ringgold is a recognized leader in PIDs for organizations and institutions. CCC has partnered with Ringgold for years and employs its identifiers to disambiguate author affiliations related to article processing charges in CCC’s RightsLink for Scientific Communications offering. Today, among its other services, Ringgold’s IdentifyDB identifier database contains more than 600,000 organization IDs and related metadata. CCC is a long-time supporter of the creation, development, and proliferation of identifiers, including supporting initiatives such as ORCID and ISNI. As a trusted partner in the evolution of hybrid and pure OA publishing models, CCC has brought together key OA stakeholders from the author, publisher, institution, funding, and vendor communities. CCC is a member of OASPA (Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association), ALPSP (Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers), STM (International Association of STM Publishers) and SSP (Society for Scholarly Publishing), and recently announced a partnership with OA Switchboard.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-line-editorial.jpeg
Red Line Editorial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ringgold-inc.jpeg
CCC Ringgold Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Red Line Editorial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CCC Ringgold Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Line Editorial in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CCC Ringgold Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Red Line Editorial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Line Editorial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CCC Ringgold Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CCC Ringgold Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-line-editorial.jpeg
Red Line Editorial
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ringgold-inc.jpeg
CCC Ringgold Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Red Line Editorial company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CCC Ringgold Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CCC Ringgold Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Red Line Editorial company.

In the current year, CCC Ringgold Solutions company and Red Line Editorial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CCC Ringgold Solutions company nor Red Line Editorial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CCC Ringgold Solutions company nor Red Line Editorial company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CCC Ringgold Solutions company nor Red Line Editorial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Red Line Editorial company nor CCC Ringgold Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor CCC Ringgold Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CCC Ringgold Solutions company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Red Line Editorial company.

Red Line Editorial company employs more people globally than CCC Ringgold Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor CCC Ringgold Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor CCC Ringgold Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor CCC Ringgold Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor CCC Ringgold Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor CCC Ringgold Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor CCC Ringgold Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.