Comparison Overview

Red Line Editorial

VS

BenBella Books

Red Line Editorial

2297 Waters Dr, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, 55120, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Our beginnings are humble: just the founder in an 8-by-10 space in an unfinished basement in 1998. Today, Red Line Editorial is a full-service editorial house serving traditional and digital publishers. We’ve done some big things, but we’re still small. Each year our team produces more than 500 books, most of them for the K-12 educational market. We work with publishers big and small to concept, develop, and produce content that engages and enlightens. Product development, marketing, and digital hosting services ensure you find the audience you’re looking for. In addition to book development, RLE also continues our long tradition of producing journalistic sports stories for clients ranging from grassroots organizations to the US Olympic & Paralympic Team. We’re still a small company proudly based in Minneapolis-St. Paul, but we do big things for our clients.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BenBella Books

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25

BenBella Books is one of a new breed of independent publishing houses that is thriving in the current turbulent publishing environment. We are a boutique book publisher that puts a big emphasis on creative marketing, building strong partnerships with authors, and publishing strategically in niche markets. BenBella publishes a range of nonfiction (and the very occasional fiction title). BenBella has had ten recent New York Times bestsellers, and one title exceeding one million copies sold. BenBella publishes broadly, but is particularly strong in health and nutrition, business, memoir, popular science, and pop culture. BenBella publishes the very successful Smart Pop series, smart and entertaining critical examinations of television, movies, comics and books.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-line-editorial.jpeg
Red Line Editorial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benbella-books.jpeg
BenBella Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Red Line Editorial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BenBella Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Line Editorial in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BenBella Books in 2025.

Incident History — Red Line Editorial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Line Editorial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BenBella Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BenBella Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-line-editorial.jpeg
Red Line Editorial
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/benbella-books.jpeg
BenBella Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Red Line Editorial company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BenBella Books company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BenBella Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Red Line Editorial company.

In the current year, BenBella Books company and Red Line Editorial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BenBella Books company nor Red Line Editorial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BenBella Books company nor Red Line Editorial company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BenBella Books company nor Red Line Editorial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Red Line Editorial company nor BenBella Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor BenBella Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Red Line Editorial company nor BenBella Books company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Red Line Editorial company and BenBella Books company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor BenBella Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor BenBella Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor BenBella Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor BenBella Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor BenBella Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Red Line Editorial nor BenBella Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.