Comparison Overview

Red Bridge Productions

VS

Films at 59

Red Bridge Productions

Dogwood Lane, Larchmont, 10538, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.redbridgeproductions.org

Red Bridge Productions, LLC is a recently formed independent production company based in Larchmont, NY. Our first project is a documentary film, currently in production, exploring the ongoing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Our production crew has situated themselves in the Gulf region, in hopes of documenting the environmental, social, and economic effects of the spill on individual, local, and regional levels. Our current production base is in New Orleans, Louisiana, from where we maintain a home base and can explore the most highly impacted areas and individuals. Through our time here and the film we produce, we hope to inform ourselves and others in order to help change the way people think about and interact with our world as well as provide a picture of truth for the residents of the Gulf coast and beyond.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Films at 59

59 Cotham Hill, Bristol, BS6 6JR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.filmsat59.com

An independently owned post house based in the heart of Bristol’s media hub Films at 59 provides a creative and cost-effective range of pre and post production services with sustainability at our core. Our services include production consultancy, crewing services, shooting equipment hire, grading, picture editing, sound editing and dubbing.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bridge-productions.jpeg
Red Bridge Productions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/films-at-59.jpeg
Films at 59
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Red Bridge Productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Films at 59
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Bridge Productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Films at 59 in 2025.

Incident History — Red Bridge Productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Bridge Productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Films at 59 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Films at 59 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bridge-productions.jpeg
Red Bridge Productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/films-at-59.jpeg
Films at 59
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Red Bridge Productions company and Films at 59 company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Films at 59 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Red Bridge Productions company.

In the current year, Films at 59 company and Red Bridge Productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Films at 59 company nor Red Bridge Productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Films at 59 company nor Red Bridge Productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Films at 59 company nor Red Bridge Productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Red Bridge Productions company nor Films at 59 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Red Bridge Productions nor Films at 59 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Red Bridge Productions company nor Films at 59 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Films at 59 company employs more people globally than Red Bridge Productions company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither Red Bridge Productions nor Films at 59 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Red Bridge Productions nor Films at 59 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Red Bridge Productions nor Films at 59 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Red Bridge Productions nor Films at 59 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Red Bridge Productions nor Films at 59 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Red Bridge Productions nor Films at 59 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References