Comparison Overview

ReCon Management Services, Inc.

VS

Monash Human Power

ReCon Management Services, Inc.

1907 Ruth Street, Sulphur, Louisiana, 70663, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

ReCon was established in 1995 and has matured as a high quality and competitive engineering consulting firm providing engineering design and project management services to the commercial, refining, chemical, power, terminals and pipelines, and pulp and paper industries. ReCon has built a reputation for energy, innovation and quality. Our approach is to be the engineering contractor of choice for our customers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 439
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Monash Human Power

23 College Walk, Clayton, Victoria, AU, 3168
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Monash Human Power (MHP) is a student run organisation based at Monash University, Clayton. The team's mission is to design and build a safe, fast and efficient human powered vehicle (HPV). A HPV is essentially a recumbent bicycle enclosed within an aerodynamic fairing, intended to reduce the air resistance to allow the cyclist to travel at incredible speeds along a straight track. The team's ultimate goal is to compete in the International Human Power Vehicle competition held in Battle Mountain, Nevada, USA and claim the top speed land record for a human powered vehicle. Founded in 2014 by the wind tunnel management of Monash University, in 2016 MHP moved to a larger and more interdisciplinary team of students from Engineering, Industrial Design, Business and Science. Student members are given the opportunity to apply concepts and techniques acquired throughout their tertiary education and to to gain invaluable hands-on experience that will be useful for their chosen careers. Monash Human Power is currently in the process of testing the third iteration of their Human Powered Vehicle and are hoping to compete with it in the 2023 World Human Powered Speed Challenge.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recon-management-services-inc.jpeg
ReCon Management Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monashhumanpower.jpeg
Monash Human Power
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ReCon Management Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Monash Human Power
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ReCon Management Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monash Human Power in 2025.

Incident History — ReCon Management Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ReCon Management Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Monash Human Power (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monash Human Power cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recon-management-services-inc.jpeg
ReCon Management Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monashhumanpower.jpeg
Monash Human Power
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ReCon Management Services, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Monash Human Power company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Monash Human Power company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ReCon Management Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Monash Human Power company and ReCon Management Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Monash Human Power company nor ReCon Management Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Monash Human Power company nor ReCon Management Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Monash Human Power company nor ReCon Management Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. company nor Monash Human Power company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. nor Monash Human Power holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. company nor Monash Human Power company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ReCon Management Services, Inc. company employs more people globally than Monash Human Power company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. nor Monash Human Power holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. nor Monash Human Power holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. nor Monash Human Power holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. nor Monash Human Power holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. nor Monash Human Power holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ReCon Management Services, Inc. nor Monash Human Power holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H