Comparison Overview

Recipe

VS

Salesland

Recipe

21 Stephen Street, London, England, W1T 1LN, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Normal work is never as effective as youโ€™d hope, and making work in the normal way is never as efficient. At Recipe weโ€™re not normal. We didnโ€™t start in the normal way. We donโ€™t make work in the normal way. We donโ€™t make normal work. No outsourcing. No losing control. No wastage. No hierarchy. No egos. So if you are after normal, apologies for wasting your time and have a good day.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Salesland

Calle de Rufino Gonzโˆšยฐlez, 40 2ยฌโˆซ planta Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid 28037, ES
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Moderate

Between 600 and 700

We are Sales Specialists. Since 2000, we recruit, train and lead commercial teams focused on providing value added in very sale. We offer a global sales service that covers every aspects of direct and indirect selling, included: Sales Force, Point of Sale, Remote Sale, Digital Sale and Marketing & Advertising (Brands). We are presents in 13 countries in 2 continents (Spain, Portugal, Peru, Colombia, Chile, Mexico, Ecuador, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panamโˆšยฐ, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Honduras), with a team of 11.000 professionals.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recipelondon.jpeg
Recipe
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salesland.jpeg
Salesland
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Recipe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Salesland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Recipe in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Salesland in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Recipe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Recipe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Salesland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Salesland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recipelondon.jpeg
Recipe
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/salesland.jpeg
Salesland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Recipe company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Salesland company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Salesland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Recipe company.

In the current year, Salesland company and Recipe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Salesland company nor Recipe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Salesland company nor Recipe company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Salesland company nor Recipe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Recipe company nor Salesland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Recipe company nor Salesland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Recipe company employs more people globally than Salesland company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X