Comparison Overview

Recharge

VS

KMH Editing

Recharge

125 Wood Street, London, undefined, EC2V 7AN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

RECHARGE is the world’s leading provider of business intelligence for the renewable-energy industries, combining award-winning international coverage of breaking news, in-depth features and analysis that, through a digital online platform and bimonthly magazine, deliver depth and dimension on the stories that matter most to the wind and solar sectors. Founded in 2009 by Norway's NHST Media Group, Recharge has offices in the UK, Norway, Germany, Japan, Brazil and the US. Website: www.rechargenews.com

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KMH Editing

None, None, Minneapolis, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

KMH Editing provides freelance book editing services for publishers and writers. Owner Kellie M. Hultgren draws on her decade of in-house experience to deliver meticulous, on-deadline copy editing, proofreading, and substantive editing, as well as coaching and developmental editing . Current clients include Lerner Publishing Group/Carolrhoda Books, Quayside Publishing Group, the University of Notre Dame Press, and Yoyo Books; self-publishers such as Beaver's Pond Press, Smith House Press, and Wise Ink Publishing; and individual and corporate authors. Specialties include children's books and YA (fiction and nonfiction), teen fiction and New Adult, general fiction (especially science fiction, fantasy, thrillers, and action/adventure), essays, social and cultural history, and memoir.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recharge-newspaper.jpeg
Recharge
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmh-editing.jpeg
KMH Editing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Recharge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KMH Editing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Recharge in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KMH Editing in 2025.

Incident History — Recharge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Recharge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KMH Editing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KMH Editing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recharge-newspaper.jpeg
Recharge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmh-editing.jpeg
KMH Editing
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Recharge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KMH Editing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KMH Editing company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Recharge company has not reported any.

In the current year, KMH Editing company and Recharge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KMH Editing company nor Recharge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

KMH Editing company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Recharge company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither KMH Editing company nor Recharge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Recharge company nor KMH Editing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Recharge nor KMH Editing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Recharge company nor KMH Editing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Recharge company employs more people globally than KMH Editing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Recharge nor KMH Editing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Recharge nor KMH Editing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Recharge nor KMH Editing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Recharge nor KMH Editing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Recharge nor KMH Editing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Recharge nor KMH Editing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.