Comparison Overview

Real IPM Kenya

VS

Yara International

Real IPM Kenya

Madaraka, Thika, 4001 - 01002, KE
Last Update: 2026-02-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://realipm.com/about-us/

We are the leading Biopesticides company in Kenya where high quality predatory mites are produced. We have global rights to several isolates of Metarhizium under license from ICIPE International Research Institute. Together with our own biopesticides isolates, we have a comprehensive offer for crop protection solutions to both Small Scale and Large Scale Farmers

NAICS: 111
NAICS Definition: Crop Production
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Yara International

Drammensveien 131, Oslo, NO, N-0277
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.yara.com

Yara's mission is to responsibly feed the world and protect the planet. We pursue a strategy of sustainable value growth through reducing emissions from crop nutrition production and developing low-emission energy solutions. Yara’s ambition is focused on growing a nature-positive food future that creates value for our customers, shareholders and society at large and delivers a more sustainable food value chain. To drive the green shift in fertilizer production, shipping, and other energy intensive industries, Yara will produce ammonia with significantly lower emissions. We provide digital tools for precision farming and work closely with partners at all levels of the food value chain to share knowledge and promote more efficient and sustainable solutions. Founded in 1905 to solve the emerging famine in Europe, Yara has established a unique position as the industry’s only global crop nutrition company. With 18,000 employees and operations in more than 60 countries, sustainability is an integral part of our business model. In 2024, Yara reported revenues of USD 13.9 billion.

NAICS: 111
NAICS Definition: Crop Production
Employees: 14,843
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/real-ipm.jpeg
Real IPM Kenya
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yara.jpeg
Yara International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Real IPM Kenya
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Yara International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Farming Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Real IPM Kenya in 2026.

Incidents vs Farming Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yara International in 2026.

Incident History — Real IPM Kenya (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Real IPM Kenya cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Yara International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yara International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/real-ipm.jpeg
Real IPM Kenya
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yara.jpeg
Yara International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Yara International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Real IPM Kenya company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Real IPM Kenya company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Yara International company has not reported any.

In the current year, Yara International company and Real IPM Kenya company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Yara International company nor Real IPM Kenya company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Real IPM Kenya company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Yara International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Yara International company nor Real IPM Kenya company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Real IPM Kenya company nor Yara International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Real IPM Kenya nor Yara International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Real IPM Kenya company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Yara International company.

Yara International company employs more people globally than Real IPM Kenya company, reflecting its scale as a Farming.

Neither Real IPM Kenya nor Yara International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Real IPM Kenya nor Yara International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Real IPM Kenya nor Yara International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Real IPM Kenya nor Yara International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Real IPM Kenya nor Yara International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Real IPM Kenya nor Yara International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References