Comparison Overview

Reach For Youth, Inc.

VS

Meridian Healthcare

Reach For Youth, Inc.

3505 N. Washington Blvd., Indianapolis, IN, 46205, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.reachforyouth.org

Our mission is: to empower Central Indiana youth and their families through prevention, intervention, counseling and youth development initiatives. For over 49 years Reach For Youth, Inc. has provided quality youth programming to Central Indiana youth and their families. We provide counseling programs that address alcohol and drug addiction, depression, anger management, sexual violence and a nationally recognized Teen Court program that brings juvenile offenders and trained youth volunteers together to provide youthful offenders a second chance.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Meridian Healthcare

1565 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, 32608, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://mbhci.org/

Every day, we support our patients and their families on their journey to hope, recovery, and wellness. We provide them with resources to rise from challenges and soar to new heights. The word meridian means “a high point.” That’s what we strive for: to build up community by helping people reach their highest potential. Since our founding over 50 years ago, we’ve broadened our behavioral health services and expanded our reach to 14 counties throughout North Central Florida. But we are still guided by a shared purpose: people first, always. This means we treat mental illness and substance use with humanity and compassion for every individual. We nurture our staff and support their abilities because they are what makes Meridian such a special place.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 490
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reach-for-youth-inc-.jpeg
Reach For Youth, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mymeridianhealthcare.jpeg
Meridian Healthcare
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reach For Youth, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meridian Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reach For Youth, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Meridian Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Reach For Youth, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reach For Youth, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Meridian Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Meridian Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reach-for-youth-inc-.jpeg
Reach For Youth, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mymeridianhealthcare.jpeg
Meridian Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Meridian Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reach For Youth, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Meridian Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reach For Youth, Inc. company.

In the current year, Meridian Healthcare company and Reach For Youth, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Meridian Healthcare company nor Reach For Youth, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Meridian Healthcare company nor Reach For Youth, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Meridian Healthcare company nor Reach For Youth, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. company nor Meridian Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. nor Meridian Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. company nor Meridian Healthcare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Meridian Healthcare company employs more people globally than Reach For Youth, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. nor Meridian Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. nor Meridian Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. nor Meridian Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. nor Meridian Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. nor Meridian Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reach For Youth, Inc. nor Meridian Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References