Comparison Overview

REA JET US

VS

TOPPAN Group

REA JET US

7307 Young Drive, Walton Hills, OH, 44146, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to REA JET US! REA JET US is the US subsidiary of REA Elektronik GmbH, which, for over 30 years, has been a consistent leader in the developing, designing and manufacturing of industrial coding and marking systems. Designed and manufactured at our global headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, we offer a complete range of products that allow for contact-free industrial coding and marking from one source. We offer technology with excellent flexibility and variable implementation for the day-to-day needs of a demanding production environment. REA JET’s product range includes large character ink jet printers (DOD), high resolution ink jet printers (HP print technology and piezo), small character ink jet printers (CIJ), laser systems, spray mark systems and labeling systems. REA JET systems allows you to print texts, linear barcodes, DataMatrix codes, logos, product information, best-before dates, batch numbers, data for tracking and quality assurance. With REA JET's robust and proven coding and marking systems, contact-based technologies such as stamps and stencils become obsolete REA JET is committed to providing the best systems at a fair and competitive price and maintains a company core value and promise to always service and support our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TOPPAN Group

1-3-3, Suido, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, JP, 112-8531
Last Update: 2025-12-17

TOPPAN is a leading and diversified global provider committed to delivering sustainable, integrated solutions in fields including printing, communications, security, packaging, décor materials, electronics, and digital transformation. TOPPAN’s global team of more than 50,000 employees offers optimal solutions enabled by industry-leading expertise and technologies to address the diverse challenges of every business sector and society and contribute to the achievement of shared sustainability goals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1,217
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rea-elektronik-inc-.jpeg
REA JET US
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toppan.jpeg
TOPPAN Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
REA JET US
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TOPPAN Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REA JET US in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TOPPAN Group in 2025.

Incident History — REA JET US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REA JET US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TOPPAN Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TOPPAN Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rea-elektronik-inc-.jpeg
REA JET US
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toppan.jpeg
TOPPAN Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TOPPAN Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to REA JET US company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TOPPAN Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to REA JET US company.

In the current year, TOPPAN Group company and REA JET US company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TOPPAN Group company nor REA JET US company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TOPPAN Group company nor REA JET US company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TOPPAN Group company nor REA JET US company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither REA JET US company nor TOPPAN Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither REA JET US nor TOPPAN Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TOPPAN Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to REA JET US company.

TOPPAN Group company employs more people globally than REA JET US company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither REA JET US nor TOPPAN Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither REA JET US nor TOPPAN Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither REA JET US nor TOPPAN Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither REA JET US nor TOPPAN Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither REA JET US nor TOPPAN Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither REA JET US nor TOPPAN Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L