Comparison Overview

Re-form Commercial Office Furniture

VS

two*

Re-form Commercial Office Furniture

8410 Kelso Dr, Baltimore, Maryland, 21221, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Re-form is an Commercial Office Furniture company specializing in office furniture reuse located in Baltimore, MD, and serves Maryland, Delaware, Northern Virginia and Washington, DC. Since 1986, we have been helping our customers , both large and small, with complete in house office furniture services, including remanufacturing, space planning, project management, asset management, pickup and delivery, and installation. We have an extensive inventory of used office furniture including modular and systems furniture, work stations, office chairs, files and case goods available for immediate sale. By helping you reuse furniture, you help make our environment sustainable, and we help you save money.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

two*

500 Davis Street, San Francisco, CA, 94111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We’re two; a One Workplace venture. Two is built with the spirit of collaboration, two brings brands and cultures to life by creating smart furniture solutions for creatively minded companies. At two, we like to double down on fun, great design, and flawless execution. And we’ve assembled a team of experts who love what they do and know how to take a great design vision and bring it to life.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/re-form.jpeg
Re-form Commercial Office Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Re-form Commercial Office Furniture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
two*
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Re-form Commercial Office Furniture in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for two* in 2025.

Incident History — Re-form Commercial Office Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Re-form Commercial Office Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — two* (X = Date, Y = Severity)

two* cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/re-form.jpeg
Re-form Commercial Office Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/two-furnish.jpeg
two*
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company and two* company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, two* company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company.

In the current year, two* company and Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither two* company nor Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither two* company nor Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither two* company nor Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company nor two* company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture nor two* holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company nor two* company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

two* company employs more people globally than Re-form Commercial Office Furniture company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture nor two* holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture nor two* holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture nor two* holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture nor two* holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture nor two* holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Re-form Commercial Office Furniture nor two* holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.