Comparison Overview

rdesign

VS

Fervor Creative

rdesign

Commelinstraat, Amsterdam, 1093 VD, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Creatief en opvallend werk maken, zonder de houding van een reclamebureau. Bij ons zit je samen met de creatieven aan tafel, dat werkt effectief en leuk! Door creativiteit, media en technologie optimaal te benutten, komen we tot de mooiste resultaten. Al sinds 1996. Meer weten? Bel +31(0)6 43 81 71 31 of mail Remco Hovemann [email protected] www.rdesign.nl www.facebook.com/rdesignamsterdam concept . creatie . productie

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fervor Creative

7038 East Osborn Rd, Scottsdale, Arizona, 85251, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Fervor Creative is a multidisciplinary design agency that is passionate about ideas driven by strategy and relationships built on trust. Fervor Creative is different. We were founded by creative professionals who maintain that there is a better way to manage design. You speak directly with decision makers, which means your branding represents you (no matter what the medium), ideas are clearly framed by strategic goals throughout the process, and relationships are built on trust.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rdesign.jpeg
rdesign
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fervor-creative.jpeg
Fervor Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
rdesign
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fervor Creative
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for rdesign in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fervor Creative in 2025.

Incident History — rdesign (X = Date, Y = Severity)

rdesign cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fervor Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fervor Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rdesign.jpeg
rdesign
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fervor-creative.jpeg
Fervor Creative
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

rdesign company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fervor Creative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fervor Creative company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to rdesign company.

In the current year, Fervor Creative company and rdesign company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fervor Creative company nor rdesign company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fervor Creative company nor rdesign company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fervor Creative company nor rdesign company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither rdesign company nor Fervor Creative company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither rdesign nor Fervor Creative holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither rdesign company nor Fervor Creative company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fervor Creative company employs more people globally than rdesign company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither rdesign nor Fervor Creative holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither rdesign nor Fervor Creative holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither rdesign nor Fervor Creative holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither rdesign nor Fervor Creative holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither rdesign nor Fervor Creative holds HIPAA certification.

Neither rdesign nor Fervor Creative holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X