Comparison Overview

RBO

VS

Ocean Group Co

RBO

2463 Schuetz Rd., Maryland Heights, MO, US, 63043
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.RBOinc.com

We help brands become leaders in their industries through a mix of solutions that include creative services, brand controls, brand fulfillment, and metrics. These four pillars are the foundation of our holistic approach to elevating brand identities and relieving the burden faced by today’s busy marketing professionals. Through a mix of technology, devoted customer service, and efficient processes and workflow, we execute on the entire supply chain with offerings covering concept, sourcing, online ordering, printing, warehousing, and distribution, ensuring efficient fulfillment for any project, no matter how complex. This has made us the preferred brand printing and promotions partner for over 500 clients in multiple industries across the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 163
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ocean Group Co

700-5 Union Parkway, Ronkonkoma, New York, 11779, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oceangroupcompany.com

Ocean Group pairs offset and digital printing platforms with the latest technology to increase our customer’s return on investment and brand recognition. Not one company’s needs and goals are the same and that’s why our dedicated production and creative teams work closely with each customer to discover their objectives and create a unique solution. Our services include: • Offset/Digital Printing • Direct Mail Marketing • Cross-Channel Marketing • Creative Services • Promotional Marketing • Warehousing and Fulfillment • Website Development • Data Management From personalized mailings to landing page design, Ocean Group can do it all for you. Our competitive advantage lies in our ability to provide all of these services to our customers directly from our 27,000 square foot facility. From daily operations to the products we use, Ocean strives to provide you with a superior product while minimizing our carbon footprint. Our practices include: • Use of recycled paper in our printing • Use of water-based coatings in our print processes • Print using soy-based inks rather than non-renewable petroleum-based inks. Soy inks allow for easier, more eco-friendly recycling processes • Recycle used and leftover paper from our daily activities and print runs Ocean’s Volunteers in Action program gathers employees, friends and family to raise funds and awareness for non-profits in the communities where we live and work. Submit for non-profit support at [email protected].

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rboinc.jpeg
RBO
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocean-group-co.jpeg
Ocean Group Co
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RBO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ocean Group Co
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBO in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ocean Group Co in 2025.

Incident History — RBO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ocean Group Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ocean Group Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rboinc.jpeg
RBO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ocean-group-co.jpeg
Ocean Group Co
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both RBO company and Ocean Group Co company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Ocean Group Co company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RBO company.

In the current year, Ocean Group Co company and RBO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ocean Group Co company nor RBO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ocean Group Co company nor RBO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ocean Group Co company nor RBO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RBO company nor Ocean Group Co company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RBO nor Ocean Group Co holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RBO company nor Ocean Group Co company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RBO company employs more people globally than Ocean Group Co company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither RBO nor Ocean Group Co holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RBO nor Ocean Group Co holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RBO nor Ocean Group Co holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RBO nor Ocean Group Co holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RBO nor Ocean Group Co holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RBO nor Ocean Group Co holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References