Comparison Overview

RBO

VS

Aspenprint

RBO

2463 Schuetz Rd., Maryland Heights, MO, US, 63043
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We help brands become leaders in their industries through a mix of solutions that include creative services, brand controls, brand fulfillment, and metrics. These four pillars are the foundation of our holistic approach to elevating brand identities and relieving the burden faced by today’s busy marketing professionals. Through a mix of technology, devoted customer service, and efficient processes and workflow, we execute on the entire supply chain with offerings covering concept, sourcing, online ordering, printing, warehousing, and distribution, ensuring efficient fulfillment for any project, no matter how complex. This has made us the preferred brand printing and promotions partner for over 500 clients in multiple industries across the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 163
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aspenprint

262 Ringwood Road, Poole, England, BH14 0RS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

We are the UK's leading provider of design and print for the hospitality industry. Over the past 50 years the team at Aspenprint have helped over 2,500 hotels, restaurants and other businesses within the hospitality industry to market themselves through creative design and print. From larger hotel brands such as Hilton, Best Western, Crowne Plaza, Mercure, Marriott and Holiday Inn to smaller boutique hotels, restaurants and independent businesses across the UK and Channel Islands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rboinc.jpeg
RBO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenprint-poole.jpeg
Aspenprint
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RBO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aspenprint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBO in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspenprint in 2025.

Incident History — RBO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aspenprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspenprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rboinc.jpeg
RBO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aspenprint-poole.jpeg
Aspenprint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RBO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspenprint company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aspenprint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RBO company.

In the current year, Aspenprint company and RBO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aspenprint company nor RBO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aspenprint company nor RBO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aspenprint company nor RBO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RBO company nor Aspenprint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RBO nor Aspenprint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RBO company nor Aspenprint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RBO company employs more people globally than Aspenprint company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither RBO nor Aspenprint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RBO nor Aspenprint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RBO nor Aspenprint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RBO nor Aspenprint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RBO nor Aspenprint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RBO nor Aspenprint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N