Comparison Overview

RBL Bank

VS

HDFC Bank

RBL Bank

RBL Bank Limited, One World Center, Tower 2B , 6th Floor, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400013
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

RBL Bank is one of India’s fastest growing private sector banks with an expanding presence across the country. The Bank offers specialized services under six business verticals namely: Corporate & Institutional Banking, Commercial Banking, Branch & Business Banking, Retail Assets and Treasury and Financial Markets Operations. It currently services over 11.53 million customers through a network of 517 branches; 1,166 business correspondent branches (of which 298 banking outlets) and 414 ATMs spread across 28 Indian states and Union Territories. RBL Bank is listed on both NSE and BSE (RBLBANK). For further details, please visit https://www.rblbank.com RBL Bank Blog - https://blog.rblbank.com/ Don’t share personal or sensitive details on social media. Refer to our Bank’s social media guideline: https://bit.ly/3OVgJ4p

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 15,163
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HDFC Bank

Lower Parel Road, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400013, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

HDFC Bank is India's largest private sector bank, offering a comprehensive range of financial products and services to our customer base of over 92 million. Our extensive distribution network of 8,919 branches and 21,031 ATMs across 3,836 cities and towns as of August 2024, reaches every corner of the country, making us accessible to millions. Promoted by Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC), India's leading housing finance company, HDFC Bank began operations in 1995 with a simple mission: to be a "World-class Indian Bank"​. With a single-minded focus on product leadership, customer focus and operational excellence, we have emerged as a leading player in all our business segments. We cater to individuals and businesses, offering a full range of innovative banking solutions including loans, payments, and wealth management. Our business solutions empower companies of all sizes, from MSMEs to large corporations, helping them grow with tailored banking services and financial tools. In 2023, the Bank merged with HDFC Ltd, combining our robust banking services with HDFC Ltd's legacy of leadership in housing finance. This merger enhances our ability to offer home loans and other financial services, ensuring seamless access for customers across urban and rural areas. As a socially responsible corporate citizen, we believe in banking with a purpose. Through our CSR initiative, Parivartan, we actively work to drive positive change across education, healthcare, skills training, and sustainable livelihoods impacting over 10 crore lives across the country. Our commitment to community impact is as strong as our dedication to delivering value to our stakeholders. As we expand, we continue to stay at the forefront of innovation, offering seamless digital banking experiences to enhance the lives of our customers. HDFC Bank prioritises the security of its systems and remains committed to maintaining the confidentiality of its customers' data. As a precaution

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 196,135
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbl-bank.jpeg
RBL Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hdfc-bank.jpeg
HDFC Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RBL Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HDFC Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBL Bank in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HDFC Bank in 2026.

Incident History — RBL Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBL Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HDFC Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HDFC Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbl-bank.jpeg
RBL Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hdfc-bank.jpeg
HDFC Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Non-bank ATMs
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

HDFC Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RBL Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

HDFC Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RBL Bank company has not reported any.

In the current year, HDFC Bank company and RBL Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HDFC Bank company nor RBL Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

HDFC Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while RBL Bank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HDFC Bank company nor RBL Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

HDFC Bank company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while RBL Bank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RBL Bank nor HDFC Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HDFC Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RBL Bank company.

HDFC Bank company employs more people globally than RBL Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither RBL Bank nor HDFC Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor HDFC Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor HDFC Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor HDFC Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor HDFC Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor HDFC Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N