Comparison Overview

RBL Bank

VS

BBVA

RBL Bank

RBL Bank Limited, One World Center, Tower 2B , 6th Floor, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400013
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

RBL Bank is one of India’s fastest growing private sector banks with an expanding presence across the country. The Bank offers specialized services under six business verticals namely: Corporate & Institutional Banking, Commercial Banking, Branch & Business Banking, Retail Assets and Treasury and Financial Markets Operations. It currently services over 11.53 million customers through a network of 517 branches; 1,166 business correspondent branches (of which 298 banking outlets) and 414 ATMs spread across 28 Indian states and Union Territories. RBL Bank is listed on both NSE and BSE (RBLBANK). For further details, please visit https://www.rblbank.com RBL Bank Blog - https://blog.rblbank.com/ Don’t share personal or sensitive details on social media. Refer to our Bank’s social media guideline: https://bit.ly/3OVgJ4p

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 15,163
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BBVA

Plaza de San Nicolas 4, Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48005, ES
Last Update: 2025-12-09

At BBVA we are leading the transformation of banking worldwide, united in pursuing our goal of bringing the age of opportunity to everyone. Firmly focused on the future, our on-going digital transformation is already producing disruptive innovations that power our vision of banking. Every one of our 121,486 employees, from branch staff to senior leaders, plays an essential role in giving our 71.5 million customers the cutting edge banking solutions that they deserve. Building on 166 years of history we know the importance of constant development, which is why we place so much confidence in the collaborative working environment that enables our people to grow and excel. If you would like to learn about the culture and opportunities on offer at a company that is leading the way for 21st century banking, head to the ‘Life’ tab to find out more.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 119,358
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbl-bank.jpeg
RBL Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva.jpeg
BBVA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RBL Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BBVA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBL Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BBVA in 2025.

Incident History — RBL Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBL Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BBVA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BBVA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbl-bank.jpeg
RBL Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bbva.jpeg
BBVA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BBVA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RBL Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BBVA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RBL Bank company.

In the current year, BBVA company and RBL Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BBVA company nor RBL Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BBVA company nor RBL Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BBVA company nor RBL Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RBL Bank company nor BBVA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RBL Bank nor BBVA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BBVA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RBL Bank company.

BBVA company employs more people globally than RBL Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither RBL Bank nor BBVA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor BBVA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor BBVA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor BBVA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor BBVA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RBL Bank nor BBVA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N