Comparison Overview

Razgulay Group

VS

Truper

Razgulay Group

Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Core busines of the Group ($1 mlrd revenue, 15'000 hc); - agricultural production on 500 000 hectars; - 12 regional trading companies; - import of the sugar raw materials and cereals; - processing and storage capacity: * storage 17 silos 2 000 000 MT * sugar 11 plants 650 000 MT, * cereals - 4 plants 400 000 MT * flour - 4 plants 600 000 MT, - production of meat and poultry, processing to sausages, cans, freezed and cooled meat and poultry; - export of grain to 17 countries; - domestik wholesale to B2B and to trade; - production and distribution of grocery products to retail; Show more Show less

NAICS: 424
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Truper

Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Somos la empresa más reconocida en Latinoamérica en manufactura, distribución y comercialización de herramientas y productos para todos los segmentos de la industria ferretera. Nuestro catálogo está en constante crecimiento, incluye más de 15,000 productos. El buen desempeño de estos está garantizado por el Centro de Calidad Avanzada TRUPER (CCAT), el laboratorio de calidad más avanzado del mundo en el sector ferretero. Contamos con 7 marcas especializadas por segmento: TRUPER, PRETUL,VOLTECK, FOSET, FIERO, Klintek, HERMEX

NAICS: 424
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/razgulay-group.jpeg
Razgulay Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/truper.jpeg
Truper
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Razgulay Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Truper
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Razgulay Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Truper in 2025.

Incident History — Razgulay Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Razgulay Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Truper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Truper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/razgulay-group.jpeg
Razgulay Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/truper.jpeg
Truper
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Razgulay Group company and Truper company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Truper company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Razgulay Group company.

In the current year, Truper company and Razgulay Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Truper company nor Razgulay Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Truper company nor Razgulay Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Truper company nor Razgulay Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Razgulay Group company nor Truper company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Razgulay Group nor Truper holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Razgulay Group company nor Truper company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Razgulay Group company and Truper company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Razgulay Group nor Truper holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Razgulay Group nor Truper holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Razgulay Group nor Truper holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Razgulay Group nor Truper holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Razgulay Group nor Truper holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Razgulay Group nor Truper holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H