Comparison Overview

RayPress Corporation

VS

Harris Printing

RayPress Corporation

380 Riverchase Parkway East, Birmingham, Alabama, 35244, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

RayPress Corporation is a narrow web flexographic printer located in Birmingham, Alabama. A leader among label printing companies in the southeast since 1973, RayPress can create the labels you want, when you need them. Printing Products & Capabilities: Up to 16” Wide, 14 Color Capability, Water Based and/or UV Flexography, Blank Labels/EDP/Thermal and Direct Thermal Labels & Tags, Prime Labels, Flexographic Booklet Labels, Onserted Offset Quality Booklet Label, Instant Redeemable Coupons, Cold Foil Fusion, Repositionable Notes, Scratch Off Technology, Embossed Products, Static Cling, Variable Imaging, IRC Plus™*, Game & Sweepstake Pieces, Multiweb Constructions, Fully Enclosed Products, NX2 Food™ Products, Clean Release Magnets™**, Thermal Transfer, Ink Jet and Laser Imprintable Clean Release Magnets™**, Pressure Sensitive Magnets, Scratch ‘n Sniff Technology, Rub ‘n Smell Technology, Unsupported Magnets, Pro-Lift™***, Bindery Department, Art & Graphics Department, Child Safe Identification Record Cards, Trading Cards, Puzzles, Automatic Labeling Systems Division (Systems for Sale & Lease, Parts & Service, Systems Engineering and Contract Labeling).

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Harris Printing

1290 Mountain Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA, R2X 3A3
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Quality Printers Of: -Reports & Workbooks -Banners & Posters -Newsletters -Brochures -Stationary Items - Business Cards, Letterheads, Envelopes -Business Forms -Specialty Items and much more... At Harris Printing, we specialize in working directly with designers and corporate clients to provide personal service, quality craftsmanship and guaranteed satisfaction. Offset printing and high-volume digital printing are provided from our modern printing facilities in Winnipeg, Manitoba. In late 2010, Leech Printing Ltd. of Brandon, Manitoba, acquired Harris Printing to broaden its offering of print and graphic communication products and services. The combination of people, capabilities and complementary strengths has allowed Harris Printing to service existing customers and develop new opportunities to an expanded marketplace. The Harris / Leech partnership is committed to providing excellence in customer service and finished printed products.At Harris Printing, we’re committed to using leading printing technologies, and to being a good corporate citizen. Additional services are continually being introduced at each location, including short run digital colour and wide format printing to serve the broader needs of customers. Whether your printing needs are small, vast, or in between, we want to welcome you as part of the growing family of Harris Printing customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raypress-corporation.jpeg
RayPress Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harris-printing.jpeg
Harris Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RayPress Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Harris Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RayPress Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harris Printing in 2025.

Incident History — RayPress Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RayPress Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Harris Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harris Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raypress-corporation.jpeg
RayPress Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harris-printing.jpeg
Harris Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both RayPress Corporation company and Harris Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Harris Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RayPress Corporation company.

In the current year, Harris Printing company and RayPress Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Harris Printing company nor RayPress Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Harris Printing company nor RayPress Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Harris Printing company nor RayPress Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RayPress Corporation company nor Harris Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RayPress Corporation nor Harris Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RayPress Corporation company nor Harris Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

RayPress Corporation company employs more people globally than Harris Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither RayPress Corporation nor Harris Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RayPress Corporation nor Harris Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RayPress Corporation nor Harris Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RayPress Corporation nor Harris Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RayPress Corporation nor Harris Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RayPress Corporation nor Harris Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L