Comparison Overview

Rathbone Law PC

VS

Australian Lawyers Alliance

Rathbone Law PC

4949 Meadows Rd., Lake Oswego, OR, 97035, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our clients receive the value of world-class legal experience driven by innovation and motivated by an entrepreneurial spirit. Our focus is to achieve results for you on-time and on-budget. At Rathbone Barton Olsen PC you get "big firm"​ depth and experience, plus responsiveness and value. Large law firms boast of their depth and research capabilities, but with the technological changes of the last decade we have equal access to comparable resources and professionals. Our advantage is that we are nimble enough to address the needs of companies of all sizes, and experienced enough to provide seasoned advice. The principals of Rathbone Barton Olsen are recognized regionally and nationally as trusted real estate and business attorneys. We have represented some of the country's largest companies as well as the region's smallest entrepreneurs. Our goal is to earn your trust, become your valued advisors, explain the law to you in plain English, and get results. Hard work, excellent work product and clear focus is why respected clients choose Rathbone Barton Olsen.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Australian Lawyers Alliance

321 Kent St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Australian Lawyers Alliance is a national association of lawyers, academics and other professionals dedicated to protecting and promoting justice, freedom and the rights of the individual. We promote access to justice and equality before the law for all individuals regardless of their wealth, position, gender, age, race or religious belief. The ALA office is located on land traditionally owned by the Gadigal of the Eora Nation, and we acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of the lands on which we work as the first people of this country.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rathbone-barton-olsen-pc.jpeg
Rathbone Law PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-lawyers-alliance.jpeg
Australian Lawyers Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rathbone Law PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Lawyers Alliance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rathbone Law PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Lawyers Alliance in 2025.

Incident History — Rathbone Law PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rathbone Law PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Lawyers Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Lawyers Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rathbone-barton-olsen-pc.jpeg
Rathbone Law PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-lawyers-alliance.jpeg
Australian Lawyers Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rathbone Law PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Australian Lawyers Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Australian Lawyers Alliance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rathbone Law PC company.

In the current year, Australian Lawyers Alliance company and Rathbone Law PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Lawyers Alliance company nor Rathbone Law PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Lawyers Alliance company nor Rathbone Law PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Lawyers Alliance company nor Rathbone Law PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rathbone Law PC company nor Australian Lawyers Alliance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rathbone Law PC nor Australian Lawyers Alliance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rathbone Law PC company nor Australian Lawyers Alliance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Australian Lawyers Alliance company employs more people globally than Rathbone Law PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Rathbone Law PC nor Australian Lawyers Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rathbone Law PC nor Australian Lawyers Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rathbone Law PC nor Australian Lawyers Alliance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rathbone Law PC nor Australian Lawyers Alliance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rathbone Law PC nor Australian Lawyers Alliance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rathbone Law PC nor Australian Lawyers Alliance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X