Comparison Overview

Rapp Bomek AS

VS

Control Southern

Rapp Bomek AS

Kvitberget 5, Bodoe, 8012, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

When safety comes first Rapp Bomek designs, develops and manufactures a complete range of advanced door, window and wall safety solutions for energy, civil and defence markets worldwide, that withstand the toughest environments and comply with the highest industry standards. We offer global service and maintenance through our network of agents and certified service professionals and help customers to maximize product lifetime, whilst minimizing costs, through our lifetime service concept “Certified for life”. Over 30 years’ experience, unique engineering expertise and modern, flexible production facilities enable us to custom build solutions to our customers’ individual needs and we can deliver turnkey solutions on EPCIC basis, or supply standard products, as required. Rapp Bomek is committed to innovation and our dedicated R&D department continuously develops our range in line with new market demands and industry requirements. Our corporate headquarters are located in Bodø, northern Norway and we have modern production facilities in Bodø and Kapp with 135 employees. Rapp Bomek has been a market leader in the global structural safety industry for over 30 years.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Control Southern

3850 Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, GA, 30024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Control Southern is an integrated solutions provider helping manufacturing plants in the Southeast run better, faster, and smarter through automation and customized valve solutions. Our customer base spans multiple industries, including: Pulp and Paper, Power, Chemical, Oil and Gas, Food and Beverage, Life Sciences, Natural Gas, OEM, and Metals and Mining. Headquartered in Suwanee, Georgia, Control Southern has been a strategic partner to Emerson and a trusted automation partner for the process industries in the Southeast for more than six decades. As an exclusive Emerson Impact Partner for Georgia, Florida, East Tennessee and North Alabama along with the Bahama’s, we are Emerson’s certified and locally-accessible contact for sales, service, and applied engineering of products and solutions across North America. We offer the most comprehensive range of integrated industry solutions within and beyond the Emerson portfolio. Our integrated portfolio of products and services enables customers to lower costs, increase efficiency, and achieve top quartile performance while at the same time demonstrating environmental leadership.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 208
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapp-bomek-as.jpeg
Rapp Bomek AS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/control-southern.jpeg
Control Southern
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rapp Bomek AS
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Control Southern
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rapp Bomek AS in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Control Southern in 2025.

Incident History — Rapp Bomek AS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rapp Bomek AS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Control Southern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Control Southern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapp-bomek-as.jpeg
Rapp Bomek AS
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/control-southern.jpeg
Control Southern
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Control Southern company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rapp Bomek AS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Control Southern company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rapp Bomek AS company.

In the current year, Control Southern company and Rapp Bomek AS company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Control Southern company nor Rapp Bomek AS company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Control Southern company nor Rapp Bomek AS company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Control Southern company nor Rapp Bomek AS company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS company nor Control Southern company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS nor Control Southern holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS company nor Control Southern company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Control Southern company employs more people globally than Rapp Bomek AS company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS nor Control Southern holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS nor Control Southern holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS nor Control Southern holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS nor Control Southern holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS nor Control Southern holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rapp Bomek AS nor Control Southern holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H