Comparison Overview

Rapit Printing, Inc.

VS

World Press Printing

Rapit Printing, Inc.

1415 1st Avenue NW, New Brighton, Minnesota, 55112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rapit.com

Rapit Printing, locally owned and operated since 1975, began with two small presses and the philosophy that if we can make our customers’ lives easier, they will allow us to be their printer. Since that time, we have grown and evolved into a diversified printing and graphic arts company with the ability to produce a wide variety of projects in-house, with our state of the art prepress, pressroom, digital, mailing and bindery departments. With more than 50 employees, we have made life easier for thousands of business customers ranging in size from single person offices to large, multinational corporations. We would welcome the opportunity to provide your company with the level of quality and service that you deserve.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

World Press Printing

1626 Manufacturers Dr, Fenton, Missouri, 63026, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.worldpressprinting.com

World Press is a team of dedicated printing professionals who care as much about your projects as you do. We work alongside our customers addressing challenges and problem-solving. The company is independently owned by Adrian Peters and Jeffrey Stern, who have been conscientious in building a culture where people take pride in their work and are passionate about their jobs. We view ourselves as partners in all of our customers’ endeavors and bring to the table the insight and acumen required to bring even the most challenging projects to life. Here you will find technical experts and craftsmen and a focus on superior service and support, because building lasting connections with customers is always our focus. We are here to listen and the team is committed to quick response times, competitive pricing, high quality deliverables, and respect for your project timelines. Give us a call and discover what we have to offer.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapit-printing-inc..jpeg
Rapit Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-press-printing.jpeg
World Press Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rapit Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
World Press Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rapit Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Press Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Rapit Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rapit Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — World Press Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Press Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapit-printing-inc..jpeg
Rapit Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-press-printing.jpeg
World Press Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rapit Printing, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to World Press Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, World Press Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rapit Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, World Press Printing company and Rapit Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither World Press Printing company nor Rapit Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither World Press Printing company nor Rapit Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither World Press Printing company nor Rapit Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. company nor World Press Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor World Press Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. company nor World Press Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

World Press Printing company employs more people globally than Rapit Printing, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor World Press Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor World Press Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor World Press Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor World Press Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor World Press Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor World Press Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References