Comparison Overview

Rapit Printing, Inc.

VS

TPM Graphics, Inc.

Rapit Printing, Inc.

1415 1st Avenue NW, New Brighton, Minnesota, 55112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rapit.com

Rapit Printing, locally owned and operated since 1975, began with two small presses and the philosophy that if we can make our customers’ lives easier, they will allow us to be their printer. Since that time, we have grown and evolved into a diversified printing and graphic arts company with the ability to produce a wide variety of projects in-house, with our state of the art prepress, pressroom, digital, mailing and bindery departments. With more than 50 employees, we have made life easier for thousands of business customers ranging in size from single person offices to large, multinational corporations. We would welcome the opportunity to provide your company with the level of quality and service that you deserve.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TPM Graphics, Inc.

645 W. University Drive, Arlington Heights, IL, 60004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.TPMGraphics.com

TPM Graphics, Inc. is a commercial printing company founded in 1985. The principals have been actively involved in growing the business into a full service printing and bindery company. Both offset printing, up to 6 color, and digital printing are utilized to bring the highest quality product for the best price. Incorporating aqueous coating improves turnaround, and having multiple forms of booklet making allows more autonomy. One of the newer additions, an environmentally conscious, chem-free, plate-making system has improved quality as well as conditions. Recently, a new digital press was added to the mix. As a result of a collaboration between Ricoh and Heidelberg, the Linoprint C901 has become the go-to machine for short-run, economical products. TPM is using the benefits of variable data, as well as static printing to produce high-quality prints from our digital department. With the industry leading, Heidelberg equipment, from front to back, the shop is operating at maximum efficiency on multiple shifts. The long-term staff and proven track record has provided customers with confidence that jobs get done right the first time.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapit-printing-inc..jpeg
Rapit Printing, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpm-graphics-inc-.jpeg
TPM Graphics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rapit Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TPM Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rapit Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TPM Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Rapit Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rapit Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TPM Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TPM Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapit-printing-inc..jpeg
Rapit Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tpm-graphics-inc-.jpeg
TPM Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rapit Printing, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TPM Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TPM Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rapit Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, TPM Graphics, Inc. company and Rapit Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TPM Graphics, Inc. company nor Rapit Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TPM Graphics, Inc. company nor Rapit Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TPM Graphics, Inc. company nor Rapit Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. company nor TPM Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. company nor TPM Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Rapit Printing, Inc. company and TPM Graphics, Inc. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rapit Printing, Inc. nor TPM Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References