Comparison Overview

RapidScale

VS

ITC Infotech

RapidScale

301 Hillsborough Street, Suite 1300, Raleigh, NC, US, 27603
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

In today’s market, technology can define a company’s ability to compete and win. But innovation is moving so fast, most organizations struggle to manage what they have and can’t evolve quick enough to move the needle for their business. The modern cloud can help you automate manual tasks, scale capacity and modernize applications to drive revenue growth. But 90% of technology leaders say they have underestimated the complexity of the cloud. RapidScale is the managed cloud partner that turns technology into your biggest competitive advantage. Our comprehensive portfolio of private and public cloud solutions is tailored to your needs and backed by one of the deepest benches of certified experts in the industry. We make innovation easy, by bringing you the latest solutions to keep your technology platforms responsive and delivering the consistent results your business deserves.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 597
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

ITC Infotech

No.18, Banaswadi Main Road, Maruthiseva Nagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560005
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ITC Infotech is a global technology solution and services leader providing business-friendly solutions, that enable future-readiness for clients. We seamlessly bring together digital expertise, strong industry-specific alliances, and deep domain expertise from ITC Group businesses. Our solutions and services are focused on Banking and financial Services, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Consumer Goods, Travel and Hospitality. ITC Infotech is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ITC Ltd, one of India’s most admired companies.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 18,759
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapidscale.jpeg
RapidScale
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-infotech.jpeg
ITC Infotech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RapidScale
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ITC Infotech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RapidScale in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITC Infotech in 2025.

Incident History — RapidScale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RapidScale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ITC Infotech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITC Infotech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rapidscale.jpeg
RapidScale
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-infotech.jpeg
ITC Infotech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ITC Infotech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RapidScale company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

RapidScale company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ITC Infotech company has not reported any.

In the current year, ITC Infotech company and RapidScale company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ITC Infotech company nor RapidScale company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

RapidScale company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other ITC Infotech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ITC Infotech company nor RapidScale company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RapidScale company nor ITC Infotech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RapidScale nor ITC Infotech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ITC Infotech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RapidScale company.

ITC Infotech company employs more people globally than RapidScale company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither RapidScale nor ITC Infotech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RapidScale nor ITC Infotech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RapidScale nor ITC Infotech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RapidScale nor ITC Infotech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RapidScale nor ITC Infotech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RapidScale nor ITC Infotech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H