Comparison Overview

Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC

VS

Resonance Center for Women

Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC

294 West Plaza Dr, Mooresville, 28117, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

RAPHA Healthcare Services, LLC is an integrated medicine network rendering services in Addiction Medicine, Psychiatry (Mental Health) and Primary Care Services. The globalization of drug abuse has an impact everywhere and there is an abuse of more dangerous substances than ever before. This occurs at younger ages than ever before. Whether we like it or not, our society has a problem, and that problem shows up at home, school, at work, and at church. In an effort to address and combat this problem, we, at RAPHA Healthcare Services, LLC, have established a collaborative working relationship with a vast cadre of stakeholders. In so doing, we believe that the impact of our joint collaboration will be both direct and quantifiable….not only would we be able to see it, we would be able to touch it, and measure it. This impact is founded on the idea that individuals who are in treatment will be more likely to be productive members of society, will be less to likely engage in criminal activity, and will be less likely to develop into an economic burden to the local government.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Resonance Center for Women

1608 S Elwood Ave, Tulsa, OK, 74119, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Resonance promotes and supports the well-being and self-sufficiency of women and their families challenged by the criminal justice system. Our goal is to help female offenders succeed. Eleanor Hill founded Resonance in 1977 as a volunteer-based nonprofit organization dedicated to providing a support system for women facing life’s challenges. Having been suddenly widowed when her husband was overseas, Eleanor knew from personal experience the desperate need women have for a support system when facing the challenges of life. She established Resonance in a house on the grounds of St. John’s Episcopal Church, and along with a group of volunteers, began offering services that included free listening sessions, on-going support groups and educational workshops. Today, Resonance has evolved to meet the ever-changing needs of the Tulsa community and is a dual accredited, gender specific, outpatient drug and alcohol treatment facility. We are working to change Oklahoma’s unsettling distinction of having the highest per capita female incarceration rate in the world. Through reentry services, job counseling and partnerships with agencies such as Drug Court, we are doing our best to create a brighter future for our clients, our community, and our state.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resonance-center-for-women.jpeg
Resonance Center for Women
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Resonance Center for Women
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Resonance Center for Women in 2026.

Incident History — Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Resonance Center for Women (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resonance Center for Women cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resonance-center-for-women.jpeg
Resonance Center for Women
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Resonance Center for Women company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Resonance Center for Women company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company.

In the current year, Resonance Center for Women company and Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Resonance Center for Women company nor Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Resonance Center for Women company nor Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Resonance Center for Women company nor Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company nor Resonance Center for Women company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC nor Resonance Center for Women holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Resonance Center for Women company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company.

Resonance Center for Women company employs more people globally than Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC nor Resonance Center for Women holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC nor Resonance Center for Women holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC nor Resonance Center for Women holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC nor Resonance Center for Women holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC nor Resonance Center for Women holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rapha Healthcare Services,LLC nor Resonance Center for Women holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N