Comparison Overview

Range Mental Health Center

VS

New Hope Health Services

Range Mental Health Center

624 S. 13th St., Virginia, MN, 55792, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Range Mental Health Center (RMHC) was the first rural community mental health center in the United States and the first in Minnesota to provide services developed specifically for persons with serious and persistent mental illness. The Center was established in 1961 and was the 16th federally designated community mental health center in the nation, and the first in Minnesota. Mental health services are provided each year to over 5,000 adults, children, and families. The service area of RMHC covers northern St. Louis County, and expands for more than 6,800 square miles. RMHC currently employs approximately 200 individuals who provide many services, including: * Outpatient and psychiatric treatment * Community support services * Inpatient and outpatient addiction and detoxification services * Homeless adult, chronic, and youth programs * Housing services * Assertive community treatment team * Children’s community and school-based mental health programs * 8-bed community crisis stabilization unit * And a mobile crisis team RMHC also owns the Perpich Apartments, a 27-unit apartment building in Hibbing, Minn., to provide adequate housing units for individuals with severe mental illness and chronic homelessness.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 114
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New Hope Health Services

2759 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE, Washington, 20032, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

New Hope Health Services is a core service agency that focuses on mental health for individuals above 18 years of age. We are composed of a team of experienced professionals, including APRNs, psychiatrists, and licensed independent clinical social workers, who are all committed to our cause. Our agency was founded upon the desire to provide top-notch support and Mental Health Service in Washington, DC with the goal to deliver a comprehensive level of care in a dignified way, where our consumers are treated with the utmost respect.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/range-mental-health-center.jpeg
Range Mental Health Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-hope-health-services.jpeg
New Hope Health Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Range Mental Health Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Hope Health Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Range Mental Health Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Hope Health Services in 2026.

Incident History — Range Mental Health Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Range Mental Health Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Hope Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Hope Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/range-mental-health-center.jpeg
Range Mental Health Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-hope-health-services.jpeg
New Hope Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

New Hope Health Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Range Mental Health Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New Hope Health Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Range Mental Health Center company.

In the current year, New Hope Health Services company and Range Mental Health Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Hope Health Services company nor Range Mental Health Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Hope Health Services company nor Range Mental Health Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Hope Health Services company nor Range Mental Health Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Range Mental Health Center company nor New Hope Health Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Range Mental Health Center nor New Hope Health Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Range Mental Health Center company nor New Hope Health Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Range Mental Health Center company employs more people globally than New Hope Health Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Range Mental Health Center nor New Hope Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Range Mental Health Center nor New Hope Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Range Mental Health Center nor New Hope Health Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Range Mental Health Center nor New Hope Health Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Range Mental Health Center nor New Hope Health Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Range Mental Health Center nor New Hope Health Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N