Comparison Overview

Randi Miller

VS

LA Opera

Randi Miller

Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.VoiceofMetro.com

Voiceover artist, host, emcee and personality. Warm authoritative alto specializing in fundraising events. The Voice of Metro on Washington DC's subway trains, the second-largest subway system in the country, and heard by over 800,000 riders every day. Chosen over 1,258 competitors to be the first new voice on the Metrorail system since it started running in 1976. Also available for commercials, voicemail and phone systems.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

LA Opera

135 N Grand Ave, Los Angeles, 90012, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.laopera.org

Created in 1986 by a team of visionaries, LA Opera has become a leader in artistic innovation, while honoring the great historical legacy of opera. Through the powerful art form of opera, we celebrate the diversity and pioneering spirit of our great city. Hundreds of LAO employees and artists help bring to life world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, pioneering spirit and artistic sensibility unique to Los Angeles. Our productions are experienced by more than 100,000 audience members each year at our home at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion in downtown Los Angeles. We reach many more through our community and school programs, “Off Grand” performances in venues across Los Angeles, and On Now digital content.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 321
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/randi-miller.jpeg
Randi Miller
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-opera.jpeg
LA Opera
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Randi Miller
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LA Opera
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Randi Miller in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LA Opera in 2025.

Incident History — Randi Miller (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Randi Miller cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LA Opera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LA Opera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/randi-miller.jpeg
Randi Miller
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-opera.jpeg
LA Opera
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Randi Miller company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LA Opera company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LA Opera company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Randi Miller company.

In the current year, LA Opera company and Randi Miller company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LA Opera company nor Randi Miller company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LA Opera company nor Randi Miller company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LA Opera company nor Randi Miller company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Randi Miller company nor LA Opera company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Randi Miller nor LA Opera holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Randi Miller company nor LA Opera company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LA Opera company employs more people globally than Randi Miller company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Randi Miller nor LA Opera holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Randi Miller nor LA Opera holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Randi Miller nor LA Opera holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Randi Miller nor LA Opera holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Randi Miller nor LA Opera holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Randi Miller nor LA Opera holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References