Comparison Overview

RAND Graphics

VS

Autajon Labels Nederland B.V.

RAND Graphics

2820 S Hoover, Wichita, 67215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.randgraphics.com

We are a powerhouse in Digital, Lithography and Screen Printing. In both divisions, we print on conventional papers, as well as plastic, vinyl and non-standard substrates. We can print offset pieces up to 59"​ x 80"​, screen print materials in excess of 18 feet long and digitally 63" x 126" — large format, small format and everything in between. Partner with Rand Graphics and you'll have access to multiple technologies few printers can match.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Autajon Labels Nederland B.V.

Demkaweg 20, Utrecht, undefined, 3555HW, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.autajonlabels.nl/

Autajon Labels Nederland is een drukkerij van zelfklevende etiketten in Utrecht met meer dan 57 jaar ervaring in de verpakkingsindustrie en er zijn 80 werknemers met een gemiddeld dienstverband van 15 jaar dagelijks drukdoende om onze klanten te voorzien in hun verpakkingsbehoeftes. Autajon Labels Nederland valt onder het moederbedrijf AUTAJON GROUP in Frankrijk, wat in totaal meer dan 3.950 werknemers heeft verdeeld over 34 vestigingen in 10 verschillende landen wereldwijd. Decoratie, functioneel of informatief, het is allemaal mogelijk voor meerdere marktsectoren, waaronder met name technisch veeleisende sectoren. Wij zijn actief in de Parfum & Cosmetica-, Industriële-, Pharma- (medische producten), Chemie- en Consumentengoederen Industries. Wij specialiseren onszelf in alle soorten labels. Met het gebruik van de nieuwste Flexo- (conventioneel) en Digitale drukpersen is alles mogelijk binnen zeer korte leveringstermijnen. Autajon Labels Nederland is uniek in haar precisie, snelheid en technische kwaliteit die zij levert aan haar klanten door middel van de jarenlange ervaringen en haar goed opgeleide vakmensen. Met een uitgebreide keuze uit meerdere materialen, kleuren en formaten is elk zelfklevend etiket (enkel laags of meerdere lagen) van professionele kwaliteit snel te produceren. Als een kameleon passen wij ons aan, aan uw wensen! Geïnteresseerd in een offerte of meer informatie? U kunt altijd meer vinden op onze site: http://www.autajon.com/nl/

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rand-graphics.jpeg
RAND Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autajonlabelsnederland.jpeg
Autajon Labels Nederland B.V.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RAND Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Autajon Labels Nederland B.V.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RAND Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. in 2025.

Incident History — RAND Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RAND Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rand-graphics.jpeg
RAND Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autajonlabelsnederland.jpeg
Autajon Labels Nederland B.V.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RAND Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RAND Graphics company.

In the current year, Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company and RAND Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company nor RAND Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company nor RAND Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company nor RAND Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RAND Graphics company nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RAND Graphics nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RAND Graphics company.

RAND Graphics company employs more people globally than Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither RAND Graphics nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RAND Graphics nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RAND Graphics nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RAND Graphics nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RAND Graphics nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RAND Graphics nor Autajon Labels Nederland B.V. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References