Comparison Overview

RAM Companies

VS

Photo Lab, Inc.

RAM Companies

5 Commerce Park Drive, East Hampstead, NH, 03826, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ramcompanies.com/

RAM Companies is a growing family of print and ancillary solutions providers with state-of-the-art products, services, and capabilities. Our proven ability to meet the demand for high quality deliverables is demonstrated through our strong history of customer service - in philosophy and in practice. A family-owned and operated company, our success is the result of our ability to build relationships and partnerships – with each other and with our clients. RAM Companies integrated services will continue to evolve to meet the needs of clients who expect the very best. RAM Printing Inc. Full-service, high quality offset printing for clients in a broad range of industries and markets. RAM Mailing Service (RMS) Established to provide a full range of targeted, state-of-the-art direct mail and fulfillment services. Hampstead Print & Copy Diversified copying services and customized products for local and regional customers including digital output and large format printing. Guestmark International Specialized print services and products for the hospitality industry to maximize brand recognition and transform amenities into revenue-generating assets.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Photo Lab, Inc.

1026 Redna Terrace, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.photolabinc.com

Photo Lab, Inc. (Pli) opened in 1975 providing quality photographic development services to professional photographers in downtown Cincinnati, Ohio. In the early 1980's Pli moved into the digital age and relocated to a larger 30,000 sq.ft. building in a suburb of Cincinnati called Woodlawn. The facility is designed to accommodate large format visuals, while our extensive imaging services have grown over the years to encompass such specialties as grand format printing, dye sublimation, direct-to-press printing, computer graphic assembly, and a variety of digital imaging processes. We also provide finishing services in mounting, laminating, postscript end routing, fabric finishing, as well as paint and powder coatings. Pli has been providing museum quality graphics and digital imaging for four decades. Pli is a family owned company currently being managed by the third generation. Most of our key personnel have been with us for many years.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ram-companies.jpeg
RAM Companies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photo-lab-inc-.jpeg
Photo Lab, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
RAM Companies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Photo Lab, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RAM Companies in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Photo Lab, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — RAM Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RAM Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Photo Lab, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Photo Lab, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ram-companies.jpeg
RAM Companies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/photo-lab-inc-.jpeg
Photo Lab, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RAM Companies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Photo Lab, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Photo Lab, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to RAM Companies company.

In the current year, Photo Lab, Inc. company and RAM Companies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. company nor RAM Companies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. company nor RAM Companies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Photo Lab, Inc. company nor RAM Companies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither RAM Companies company nor Photo Lab, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither RAM Companies nor Photo Lab, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither RAM Companies company nor Photo Lab, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Photo Lab, Inc. company employs more people globally than RAM Companies company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither RAM Companies nor Photo Lab, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither RAM Companies nor Photo Lab, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither RAM Companies nor Photo Lab, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither RAM Companies nor Photo Lab, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither RAM Companies nor Photo Lab, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither RAM Companies nor Photo Lab, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References